2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0143814x17000186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamic linear modelling approach to public policy change

Abstract: Theories of public policy change, despite their differences, converge on one point of strong agreement: the relationship between policy and its causes can and does change over time. This consensus yields numerous empirical implications, but our standard analytical tools are inadequate for testing them. As a result, the dynamic and transformative relationships predicted by policy theories have been left largely unexplored in time series analysis of public policy. This article introduces dynamic linear modelling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This does not preclude the possibility that for certain politicians in certain municipalities, more spending on an issue may lead to more, rather than less, demand. Observing β 1 > 0 as a general, average effect would, however, reflect a quite explosive spending process, and when we did not observe this in the models it may have to do with the fact that we look at public spending observed at yearly intervals (see also Loftis and Mortensen ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This does not preclude the possibility that for certain politicians in certain municipalities, more spending on an issue may lead to more, rather than less, demand. Observing β 1 > 0 as a general, average effect would, however, reflect a quite explosive spending process, and when we did not observe this in the models it may have to do with the fact that we look at public spending observed at yearly intervals (see also Loftis and Mortensen ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Hal tersebut menyebabkan kebijakan seringkali mengalami perubahan. Menurut Loftis & Mortenses (2018), efek sebab-akibat (causal effects) adalah faktor yang menyebabkan kebijakan-kebijakan publik seringkali mengalami perubahan.…”
Section: Kebijakanunclassified
“…Posisi kebijakan yang digariskan dalam ringkasan kebijakan kemudian diperluas, dijelaskan dan dirasionalisasikan dalam rekomendasi kebijakan, dan merupakan sumber utama rincian di mana informasi kunci pada topik masalah dapat di akses. Hal ini menyebabkan risalah kebijakan menjadi jawaban untuk meningkatkan kualitas sebuah kebijakan, namun kenyataannya risalah kebijakan yang dibuat oleh institusi pemerintah tidak menunjukkan kualitas dan model kebijakan yang jelas (Loftis & Mortensen, 2017;Smith, 2018:21;Pennock, 2019:65). Akibat nya terjadi banyak kebijakan tidak merepresentasikan tujuan utama yang ingin dicapai, dan terkesan bahwa kebijakan hanyalah sebuah aturan yang harus dipatuhi (Jagers, Matti, & Nordblom, 2019).…”
Section: Model Kebijakanunclassified