2019
DOI: 10.1177/0276146719835287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dynamic Stakeholders’ Framework in a Marketing Systems Setting

Abstract: A marketing systems approach to stakeholders has never been more important in an increasingly interconnected world. Recognising the inherent limitations of a firm-centric stakeholder stance, this paper proposes a dynamic stakeholders framework to examine the interacting nature of interrelated and interdependent stakeholder effects from a societal perspective. It presents a systemic stakeholders framework that incorporates several defining features and core propositions based on Layton’s MAS mechanisms and Cole… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Still absent however is a context-specific schema to analyze the dynamic and evolving needs of FDP as both opportunity and obligation for constructive engagement via business and marketing. Such a schema is a compelling and logical extension of the genesis and evolution of the developmental and systems schools of Macromarketing (e.g., Domegan et al 2019; Layton 2009, 2019; Meade and Nason 1991; Mittelstaedt et al 2014; Peterson 2013; Shultz 2007; Shultz et al 2012; Slater 1968; Wooliscroft and Ganglmair-Wooliscroft 2018). Layton and Duffy (2018), for example, have noted the significance of “jolting” a system, which can require a fresh start to the extant system or perhaps entirely new systems (p. 401).…”
Section: Global Crisis: Obligations and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still absent however is a context-specific schema to analyze the dynamic and evolving needs of FDP as both opportunity and obligation for constructive engagement via business and marketing. Such a schema is a compelling and logical extension of the genesis and evolution of the developmental and systems schools of Macromarketing (e.g., Domegan et al 2019; Layton 2009, 2019; Meade and Nason 1991; Mittelstaedt et al 2014; Peterson 2013; Shultz 2007; Shultz et al 2012; Slater 1968; Wooliscroft and Ganglmair-Wooliscroft 2018). Layton and Duffy (2018), for example, have noted the significance of “jolting” a system, which can require a fresh start to the extant system or perhaps entirely new systems (p. 401).…”
Section: Global Crisis: Obligations and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social marketing has a strong tradition of collaborating with key stakeholders in order to listen, leverage, and learn to generate lasting social change (Domegan et al, 2019). Recently, there has been a generational shift for men to be involved in childcare and family caregiving alongside their work-related responsibilities (Albiston and O'Connor, 2016).…”
Section: The Problem: Ineffective Policy An Unreceptive Socio-culturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Padela, Wooliscroft, and Ganglmair-Wooliscroft 2020; Redmond 2018; Williams, Davey, and Johnstone 2020), application of dynamic systems modelling (e.g. Domegan et al 2020, 2019), considering the marketing/market systems in particular times and places (e.g. Baker et al 2015; Conejo and Wooliscroft 2020; Fajardo, Shultz, and Joya 2019; Jagadale, Kadirov, and Chakraborty 2018; Shultz 2012; Sredl, Shultz, and Brečić 2017), and applying systems to particular marketing phenomena (e.g.…”
Section: Macromarketing’s Potential Contributions To Systems Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%