2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dynamical consensus method based on exit–delegation mechanism for large group emergency decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to existing MAGEDM approaches 11,16,30,35,36,37,38 , the advantages of the proposed dynamic MAGEDM method are as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to existing MAGEDM approaches 11,16,30,35,36,37,38 , the advantages of the proposed dynamic MAGEDM method are as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experts involved in MAGEDM problems featured by lack of information and time pressure might hesitate among several values when they provide their opinions, however, such a practical issue is neglected in existing MAGEDM approaches 11,16,30,35,36,37,38 . To fill the gap in current MAGEDM approaches, the proposed method has taken into account the experts' hesitation by using complex linguistic expressions based on HFLTS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Step 1: The optimized model of the weights of DMs is constructed by using Equation (8)~ (10). The iteration number is set as 1000, the optimization target value is eventually obtained as 6.467 as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the consensus reaching process also has been employed to solve different application problems. For example, Xu et al [14] developed a dynamic consensus model for large-group emergency decision-making, in which an exit-delegation mechanism is utilized to handle clusters. Xu et al [15] presented a consensus model with the hesitant fuzzy preference relations and applied it to water allocation management.…”
Section: Consensus Reaching Processmentioning
confidence: 99%