2021
DOI: 10.18542/ncn.v24i3.9747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A espacialidade do modo de vida - Análise morfológica de comunidades rurais e tradicionais na região do Baixo Tocantins (PA)

Abstract: Desde os anos 1960, as políticas dirigidas para a Amazônia perseguem um “desenvolvimento”, pela transformação do meio natural e social existente e pela difusão da urbanização extensiva. O artigo investiga a expressão espacial do modo de vida em assentamentos urbano-rurais, localizados na região do Baixo Tocantins. A caracterização do modo de vida de quatro comunidades, que mantêm suas atividades vinculadas ao ritmo da natureza, permitiu o entendimento da apropriação e do uso dos espaços. O adensamento populaci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context of extended mobilities driven by extractivist interventions, mining has induced the rapid emergence of urban centers—often referred to as ‘boom towns of the Amazon’ (Godfrey, 1990; 1992)—as large masses of mobile workers agglomerate near sites of extraction forming entire neighborhoods and cities in a short period of time (see Figure 1). Beyond the formation of towns, extensions have also co‐produced materialities in urban peripheries and rural areas through both large extractivist interventions and specific forms of inhabitation adopted by Amazonian majorities (Monte‐Mór, 2004; Cardoso et al ., 2020; Oliveira and Cardoso, 2021). Apart from the extended infrastructure generated by extractivism itself—roads, railroads, energy transmission lines, telecommunication towers—rural areas in the Amazon have historically been shaped by extensions of landless peasants, tap miners, rubber tappers, riverine and indigenous peoples, producing varied settlement types and ‘multi‐sited households’ (Padoch et al ., 2008) with different patterns of land use and occupation (Brondizio et al ., 1994).…”
Section: Extractivism and Extensions In Urban Amazoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context of extended mobilities driven by extractivist interventions, mining has induced the rapid emergence of urban centers—often referred to as ‘boom towns of the Amazon’ (Godfrey, 1990; 1992)—as large masses of mobile workers agglomerate near sites of extraction forming entire neighborhoods and cities in a short period of time (see Figure 1). Beyond the formation of towns, extensions have also co‐produced materialities in urban peripheries and rural areas through both large extractivist interventions and specific forms of inhabitation adopted by Amazonian majorities (Monte‐Mór, 2004; Cardoso et al ., 2020; Oliveira and Cardoso, 2021). Apart from the extended infrastructure generated by extractivism itself—roads, railroads, energy transmission lines, telecommunication towers—rural areas in the Amazon have historically been shaped by extensions of landless peasants, tap miners, rubber tappers, riverine and indigenous peoples, producing varied settlement types and ‘multi‐sited households’ (Padoch et al ., 2008) with different patterns of land use and occupation (Brondizio et al ., 1994).…”
Section: Extractivism and Extensions In Urban Amazoniamentioning
confidence: 99%