2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A European reference protocol for quality assessment and clinical validation of autologous haematopoietic blood progenitor and stem cell grafts

Abstract: Summary:Recently, the regulatory authorities have begun to show interest in haematopoietic stem cell products. On a professional rather than a regulatory basis, the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) has established the Foundation for the Accreditation of Haematopoietic Cell Therapy (FACHT), which has drawn up guidelines for standards and accreditation of such activity. In Europe, the regulatory environment with regard to haematopoietic stem cell grafts, processing and stora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a variety of different techniques that are employed among clinical laboratories, including the ISHAGE, Milan, and Norway protocols, along with commercial reagents such as ProCOUNTt from Becton Dickinson and Stem Kitt from Beckman Coulter, for quantitative CD34 assessment. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Each of these methods utilizes slightly different staining combinations and/or gating strategies that can result in somewhat different final values. It is important to keep in mind that when a specific cell dose is referred to in the published literature, it may not correspond exactly to the same dose that would be determined by another clinical site using a different procedure.…”
Section: Flow Cytometry Analysis For Cd34 Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of different techniques that are employed among clinical laboratories, including the ISHAGE, Milan, and Norway protocols, along with commercial reagents such as ProCOUNTt from Becton Dickinson and Stem Kitt from Beckman Coulter, for quantitative CD34 assessment. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Each of these methods utilizes slightly different staining combinations and/or gating strategies that can result in somewhat different final values. It is important to keep in mind that when a specific cell dose is referred to in the published literature, it may not correspond exactly to the same dose that would be determined by another clinical site using a different procedure.…”
Section: Flow Cytometry Analysis For Cd34 Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The dual platform method has been well validated in several clinical studies that included rates of hematopoietic reconstitution. 12,16,17 Guidelines for CD34 + cell enumeration by flow cytometry have been prepared by ISHAGE, 15 the European Bone Marrow Transplant Group 18 and the British Committee for Standards in Haematology 19 supporting flow cytometry as the reference standard for CD34 + cell enumeration. The simpler single platform method was evaluated in 72 patients at a single institution and displayed excellent correlation with the dual platform method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,[27][28][29] The frozen samples were thawed in a 37 1C water bath and washed once in a PBS solution containing DNAase (100 mL Buffer A, 0.5 mL MgCl 2 500 mM þ 2.5 mL DNAase (Pulmozyme 1 mg/mL)) to prevent clumping and cell loss caused by sticky DNA fragments from dead cells, and then washed once in buffer A (500 mL PBS, 2.5 g BSA þ 10 mL Na-EDTA stock solution pH 5.5-5.7) and adjusted to a cell concentration of 2 Â 10 7 cells per mL. Samples of 50 mL were mixed with 50 mL Ab solutions and incubated for 30 min at 4 1C, then washed twice in standard buffer, resuspended to a volume of 3-400 mL and analyzed immediately.…”
Section: Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Enumerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4] One variable of major effect for post transplant care is the number of PBPCs harvested. [5][6][7][8] Therefore, several clinical studies have aimed to identify priming regimens that improve progenitor and stem cell mobilizations and collections without increased toxicity. Frequently, filgrastim (recombinant methionyl human G-CSF (r-metHuG-CSF)) is administrated alone; however, filgrastim combined with chemotherapy has proven more effective in the context of CD34 þ cell numbers harvested, [9][10][11] and this combination is considered the gold standard for priming and stem cell mobilization in relapsed malignant lymphoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%