1993
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199302)40:1<103::aid-nav3220400107>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A face search heuristic algorithm for optimizing over the efficient set

Abstract: The problem of optimizing a linear function over the efficient set of a multiple objective linear program is an important but difficult problem in multiple criteria decision making. In this article we present a flexible face search heuristic algorithm for the problem. Preliminary computational experiments indicate that the algorithm gives very good estimates of the global optimum with relatively little computational effort. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a minimal representation of a face to represent it gives us special advantages in many methods, for example, face search methods, face decomposition-based methods, descriptor set-based methods (methods are based on descriptor sets for faces), etc. In solving a problem of optimizing a function over the efficient set of a multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) problem by face search methods or by descriptor set-based methods (see, e.g., [1,13,17]) and in finding the efficient set or determining all maximal efficient faces of an MOLP problem by top-down search methods (see, e.g., [12,19,21]), the number of descriptor sets for faces of the constraint polyhedron that need to be considered can be reduced if the constraint polyhedron of the MOLP problem is represented by a minimal representation of it. In addition, based on [19, Property 2.9] and Properties 6.7-6.8, the method in [19] can be improved on the basis of representing the constraint polyhedron by a minimal representation of it because the maximal descriptor index sets for all descriptor sets whose dimensions are elements of the set {n, (n − 1), (n − 2)} need not be determined for this method, where n is the dimension of the constraint polyhedron (the constraint polyhedron is a special face of it) and the dimension of a descriptor set is one of the face described by it (see [19] or [20] for more details).…”
Section: Some Applications Of Minimal Representations Of a Facementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a minimal representation of a face to represent it gives us special advantages in many methods, for example, face search methods, face decomposition-based methods, descriptor set-based methods (methods are based on descriptor sets for faces), etc. In solving a problem of optimizing a function over the efficient set of a multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) problem by face search methods or by descriptor set-based methods (see, e.g., [1,13,17]) and in finding the efficient set or determining all maximal efficient faces of an MOLP problem by top-down search methods (see, e.g., [12,19,21]), the number of descriptor sets for faces of the constraint polyhedron that need to be considered can be reduced if the constraint polyhedron of the MOLP problem is represented by a minimal representation of it. In addition, based on [19, Property 2.9] and Properties 6.7-6.8, the method in [19] can be improved on the basis of representing the constraint polyhedron by a minimal representation of it because the maximal descriptor index sets for all descriptor sets whose dimensions are elements of the set {n, (n − 1), (n − 2)} need not be determined for this method, where n is the dimension of the constraint polyhedron (the constraint polyhedron is a special face of it) and the dimension of a descriptor set is one of the face described by it (see [19] or [20] for more details).…”
Section: Some Applications Of Minimal Representations Of a Facementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a similar bilevel formulation has been used in the context of MOLPs in [36][37][38][39][40]. In these papers, an additional linear function (i.e., not necessarily a criterion function of the MOLP) is optimized over the (weakly) efficient solutions of the problem.…”
Section: Bilevel Controlled-spacing Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 2 [45], shown in (40), is a nonconvex problem with a disconnected Pareto set and a connected weak Pareto set. We first solved the problem with respect to the Note that in both figures we "zoomed in" on the interesting portion of the nondominated set.…”
Section: Constraint Controlled-spacing Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%