2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2008.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A family of q-Dyson style constant term identities

Abstract: By generalizing Gessel-Xin's Laurent series method for proving the Zeilberger-Bressoud q-Dyson Theorem, we establish a family of qDyson style constant term identities. These identities give explicit formulas for certain coefficients of the q-Dyson product, including three conjectures of Sills' as special cases and generalizing Stembridge's first layer formulas for characters of SL(n, C).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 4, we apply Theorem 1.2 to prove and generalise Kadell's orthogonality conjecture. Finally, in Section 5, answering a question raised by the anonymous referee, we show that Kadell's orthogonality conjecture implies a conjecture of Sills [32] proved previously by Lv, Xin and Zhou using different means [28].…”
Section: Introduction and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In Section 4, we apply Theorem 1.2 to prove and generalise Kadell's orthogonality conjecture. Finally, in Section 5, answering a question raised by the anonymous referee, we show that Kadell's orthogonality conjecture implies a conjecture of Sills [32] proved previously by Lv, Xin and Zhou using different means [28].…”
Section: Introduction and Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Using this algorithm, Sills [8] guessed and proved closed-form expressions for M to be xs xr , xsxt x 2 r and xtxu xrxs . These results and their q-analogies were recently generalized for M with a square free numerator by Lv, Xin and Zhou [7] by extending Gessel-Xin's Laurent series method [3] for proving the q-Dyson Theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will follow notations in [9,16], where different versions of the vanishing lemma were proposed for dealing with q-Dyson related constant terms. The new vanishing lemma will be handled by the same idea but we have to carry out the details.…”
Section: Proof Of the Vanishing Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this basic idea was used by Habsieger for q-Selberg integral in [12]. The equality at the d vanishing points are not hard to handle by the techniques in [9,16]. But in this approach, we have to deal with two problems: i) the multiple roots problem for small k; ii) the d + 1-st suitable point is hard to find.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%