2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast attribute reduction method for large formal decision contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most intensively studied research lines by the research community of FCA in the last years, consists on decreasing the number of attributes of a dataset, preserving the information provided by the dataset [1,2,7,8,10,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. In [6], authors proved that every reduction of attributes of a formal context induces an equivalent relation whose equivalent classes are join-semilattices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most intensively studied research lines by the research community of FCA in the last years, consists on decreasing the number of attributes of a dataset, preserving the information provided by the dataset [1,2,7,8,10,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. In [6], authors proved that every reduction of attributes of a formal context induces an equivalent relation whose equivalent classes are join-semilattices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are proposals that combine FCA with TWD through three-way concept lattices (including duality [53]) and as a bridge between rough set concept analysis and FCA (see the recent [54]). In [55] authors use attribute reduction techniques on formal decision contexts in order to reduce the number of new concepts to be calculated. The same applies to cost-sensitive attribute reduction methods [56] and radius-based ones [57].…”
Section: Conclusion Related and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entropy weight method is an objective weighting method based on normalization matrix calculation and is not suitable for discrete data [68,69]. The entropy weight method analyzes the influence of indicator variation on the weight [70,71], while the attribute reduction set method examines the dependence of decision attributes on conditional attributes [72][73][74]. By combining the weights obtained by both methods, this paper has comprehensively considered the importance of each attribute to decision-making and the influence of information quantity within each attribute on decision-making, thus determining the weight of attributes based on two aspects and making up for the shortcomings of the attribute reduction set method in weight determination.…”
Section: Evaluation Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%