2017
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2017.2720664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Cloud Detection Algorithm Applicable to Monitoring and Nowcasting of Daytime Cloud Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not necessary to use all the four channels for constructing CI predictors reflecting cloud optical thickness. With regard to the contrast between the surface and cloud top, channel 1 reflectance ( ρ 0.47 ) is the most significant among channels 1 -4 (Zhuge et al 2017). Therefore, a subset of 12 candidate interest fields are selected for describing the atmospheric states and cloud-top properties (Table Table 1 3).…”
Section: Interest Fields Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not necessary to use all the four channels for constructing CI predictors reflecting cloud optical thickness. With regard to the contrast between the surface and cloud top, channel 1 reflectance ( ρ 0.47 ) is the most significant among channels 1 -4 (Zhuge et al 2017). Therefore, a subset of 12 candidate interest fields are selected for describing the atmospheric states and cloud-top properties (Table Table 1 3).…”
Section: Interest Fields Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step separates thick cloud pixels from clear sky and thin cirrus pixels. Since the clouds and the Earth surface have different reflectance spectra in the visible and near-infrared frequencies, a fast cloud detection method involving AHI 0.47-, 0.64-, and 0.86-μm channels (Zhuge et al 2017) is used to distinguish cloudy pixels from clear sky pixels. After that, thin cirrus pixels are discarded if the normalized reflectance of 0.47-μm visible channel is lower than 0.35.…”
Section: Cumulus Cloud Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Himawari-8/9 and GK-2A are appropriate for monitoring the sea fog in the Yellow Sea because they have widespread spatial coverage and a high temporal resolution. This study used Himawari-8 data equipped with an AHI sensor containing three VIS channels (0.47, 0.51, and 0.64 µm), three near-IR (NIR) channels (0.86, 1.61, and 2.26 µm), and 10 IR channels [8,25]. The spatial resolution at the nadir point is 0.5 km for the VIS channel at 0.64 µm, 1 km for the VIS channels at 0.47, 0.51, and 0.86 µm, and 2 km for the remaining NIR and all IR channels.…”
Section: Study Area and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the IR band, generally, the difference of brightness temperature between shortwave infrared (SWIR) (3.9 µm) and longwave infrared (LWIR) (10.8 µm) [22], referred to as bispectral image processing (BIP) [23], has been used to distinguish fog from clouds [24]. For example, the negative or near zero values of brightness temperature differences (BTD) between 3.9 and 11 µm channels during the nighttime indicates low stratus/fog or vegetated/ocean surfaces, respectively [23,25]. However, the IR-based sea fog detection algorithm is limited under twilight conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of current cloud detection methods extract the clouds from the imagery through ruled based classification which applies a set of thresholds (both static and dynamic) of reflectance and brightness temperature. [1][2][3] Most widespread threshold methods are ACCA (Automatic Cloud Cover Assessment) 4 and Fmask (Function of mask) 5,6 which was originally designed for Landsat imagery. A threshold based method is also used for the development of the Sentinel-2 cloud masks provided by the level 2A product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%