1993
DOI: 10.1029/93wr01236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Fourier transform stochastic analysis of the contaminant transport problem

Abstract: A three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of the contaminant transport problem is developed in the spirit of Naff (1990). The new derivation is more general and simpler than previous analysis. The fast Fourier transformation is used extensively to obtain numerical estimates of the mean concentration and various spatial moments. Data from both the Borden and Cape Cod experiments are used to test the methodology. Results are comparable to results obtained by other methods, and to the experiments themselves.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The covariance macrodispersive flux integral solution in equation (13), on setting R = x or R = :~, is unfortunately not a convolution like the mean concentration macrodispersive flux integral solution in (5) is, on setting ±=x. Therefore the Fourier-Laplace methodology of Deng et al [1993], [1995], and Cushman and Hu [1995], which relates the macrodispersive flux and the mean concentration field by simple algebraic expressions in Fourier-Laplace space, is not directly applicable to the covariance macrodispersive flux calculation.…”
Section: Relationship With Other Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The covariance macrodispersive flux integral solution in equation (13), on setting R = x or R = :~, is unfortunately not a convolution like the mean concentration macrodispersive flux integral solution in (5) is, on setting ±=x. Therefore the Fourier-Laplace methodology of Deng et al [1993], [1995], and Cushman and Hu [1995], which relates the macrodispersive flux and the mean concentration field by simple algebraic expressions in Fourier-Laplace space, is not directly applicable to the covariance macrodispersive flux calculation.…”
Section: Relationship With Other Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the above-mentioned finite element method McLaughlin, 1989a, b, 1991], the nonstationary spectral method is able to evaluate all first and second concentration moments, but it takes about same order of operations as the finite element method, though it may require less storage. Deng et al [1993] derived analytical expressions for the ensemble mean concentration and macrodispersive flux terms resulting from an unbounded stationary random velocity field in the Fourier transform domain, where the coupled equations of mean concentration and macrodispersive flux become decoupled. The decoupled mean concentration and macrodispersive equations can be evaluated by numerical techniques such as fast Fourier transform or numerical inverse Laplace transform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to rearrange system (15)- (18) in a workable form we make use of a perturbative expansion of the stochastic unknowns fu; pg in terms of a dimensionless parameter which is selected as s Y to represent a measure of the standard deviation of the fluctuation of the logconductivity Y [20,21]. The perturbation expansion aims at providing a recursive solution of the stochastic poroelastic problem with order of accuracy parametrized by a power of the dimensionless number s Y : The form of the closure issue discussed herein consists in establishing an N th-order accuracy in the s Y and truncate the series, neglecting the higher terms in Oðs…”
Section: Asymptotic Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evolving media, the covariance grows with the size of the region being sampled resulting in the appearance of phenomena such as anomalous diffusion (an increase of the macrodispersivity with travel distance), asymptotic scaling laws in fluid mixing regimes (References [16,17]) and non-local effects (see e.g. References [13,[18][19][20][21][22][23]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%