Materials are well-known for their function in product creation and development. There are numerous materials with various qualities on the market right now. Before deciding on the best material for a type of product, the architect must give it some thought. Research Significance: Before making a final decision, the design engineer must also consider a wide range of material eligibility requirements; otherwise, the product could fail before it should while in use. The choice to choose a material for a particular product is an example of a "multi-criteria decision-making" dilemma because it involves several competing criteria and a limited number of candidate options. Research Methodology: In this study, the "COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment) technique" is used to address some typical issues with material choice. " Al2024-T6, Al5052-O, SS301-FH, SS310-3AH, Inconel718 and 70Cu-30Zn" are further materials chosen for the cryogenic storage tank. "Toughness Index, Elastic Modulus, Yield Strength, Specific Heat, Thermal Conductivi-ty, and Density" are the material properties used as evaluation criteria. Result: The rank of alternatives using the COP-RAS method for Al2024-T6 is fifth, Al5052-O is sixth, SS301-FH is first, SS310-3AH is second, Inconel718 is third and 70Cu-30Zn is fourth. Conclusion: The outcome demonstrates that "301 Full Hard Tempered Stainless Steel" and "Stainless Steel 310" are the best materials for cryogenic tanks.