Processing cores and the accompanying main memory working in tandem enable the modern processors. Dissipating heat produced from computation remains a significant problem for processors. Therefore, the thermal management of processors continues to be an active subject of research. Most thermal management research takes place using simulations, given the challenges involved in measuring temperatures in real processors. Fast yet accurate interval thermal simulation toolchains remain the research tool of choice to study thermal management in processors at system-level. However, since in most existing processors, core and memory are fabricated on separate packages, with the memory having lower power densities than the cores, thermal management research in processors primarily focused on the cores. Consequently, state-of-the-art interval thermal simulation toolchains remain limited to core-only simulations.The memory bandwidth limitations associated with 2D processors lead to high-density 2.5D and 3D packaging technology. 2.5D packaging technology places cores and memory on the same package. 3D packaging technology takes it further by stacking layers of memory on the top of cores themselves. These new packagings significantly increase the power density of the processors, making them prone to overheating. Therefore, mitigating thermal issues in high-density processors (packaged with stacked memory) becomes an even more pressing problem. However, given the lack of thermal modeling for memories in existing interval thermal simulation toolchains, they are unsuitable for studying thermal management for high-density processors.To address this issue, we present CoMeT , the first integrated Core and Memory interval Thermal simulation toolchain. CoMeT comprehensively supports thermal simulation of high-and low-density processors corresponding to four different core-memory (integration) configurations -off-chip DDR memory, off-chip 3D memory, 2.5D, and 3D. CoMeT supports several novel features that facilitate overlying system research. Compared to an equivalent state-of-the-art core-only toolchain, CoMeT adds only an additional ∼5% simulation-time overhead. The source code of CoMeT has been made open for public use under the MIT license.