2013
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2013.070113.130921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fast Re-Route Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Totally stub areas can't contain area border routers of autonomous systems. In a totally stub area, all the external and inter-area routes are blocked, that is, the routing table of the routers, located inside a totally stub area, contains only intraarea routes and a default route to the area border router [14]. The comparison of the processes of dissemination of the topology information in a totally stub area and a standard area is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Configuring Totally Stub Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Totally stub areas can't contain area border routers of autonomous systems. In a totally stub area, all the external and inter-area routes are blocked, that is, the routing table of the routers, located inside a totally stub area, contains only intraarea routes and a default route to the area border router [14]. The comparison of the processes of dissemination of the topology information in a totally stub area and a standard area is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Configuring Totally Stub Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method to handle these kind of link failures is based on the fast re-route (FRR) methodology [10]: re-transmit the data packet locally while ensuring reachability. For example, the loopfree alternative (LFA) [11] and remote LFA (rLFA) [12] methods guide the entrance router of the failed link to re-direct the data packet to a neighbor or remote node that meets specific requirements; in the works [13], [14], additional elaborate tags are required to be added into the packet header to guide the reroute path. The major drawback of the FRR-based methods is that they can only ensure the reachability of the new route but cannot guarantee the performance, which is not preferred in the WAMS scenario with stringent QoS requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such a qualified neighbor does not always exist, and thus several extensions of LFA have been proposed such as the remote LFA [5] and recursive LFA [6]. Another kind of FRR method popular in research is to add some tags into the packet header to carry the path information and guide the re-route path selection, as proposed in [7], [8]. The main goal of the above FRR based methods is to quickly find a feasible path to the destination, but cannot guarantee the performance of the new route, which is not suitable for the WAMS scenario with stringent transmission latency requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%