2003
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.811000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast technique for unit commitment problem by extended priority list

Abstract: This paper introduces a new unit commitment problem, adapting extended priority list (EPL) method. The EPL method consists of two steps, in the first step we get rapidly some initial unit commitment problem schedules by priority list (PL) method. At this step, operational constraints are disregarded. In the second step unit schedule is modified using the problem specific heuristics to fulfill operational constraints. To calculate efficiently, however, note that some heuristics applied only to solutions can exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the Cost In the beginning, the candidate units are built for each hour to satisfy (4)(5)(6), and the minimum online unit at time t is determined by using (10). Next, the cheaper unit will be turn on with high priority.…”
Section: Production Of All Possible Candidate Units For Each Time Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the Cost In the beginning, the candidate units are built for each hour to satisfy (4)(5)(6), and the minimum online unit at time t is determined by using (10). Next, the cheaper unit will be turn on with high priority.…”
Section: Production Of All Possible Candidate Units For Each Time Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves the determination of an optimum start-up and shut-down schedule of generating units that minimizes operating cost, while satisfying a set of system constraints over a time period [1] [2]. Numerous efficient and robust UC methods have been developed and can be classified into two main categories [3]: The first category represents numerical optimization techniques such as priority list methods (PL) [4] [5] [6], dynamic programming method (DP) [7] [8], Lagrangian relaxation (LR) [9] [10] [11], and the popular branch-and-bound method (BB) [12] [13] [14] [15]. The PL method is fast but highly heuristic and gives schedules with relatively high operation costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence methods such as fuzzy and expert systems and neural networks have also been used [31]- [32]. Priority list methods [33] were among the first methods applied for the solution of the UC problem.…”
Section: B Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This certainly verifies that the proposed approach has favorable stability and the decline of value function (12) is permanent in the searching process. Figure 3 provides the comparison of the daily costs obtained by SDP [4], PL [7], DP [8], SF [16] and the proposed ADP approach for the modified IEEE 118-bus system in case 1. The less cost indicates that the proposed approach can provide high-quality solutions in comparison with other methods.…”
Section: Efficiency Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the calculation efficiency needs to be improved further for unit commitment due to the "curse of dimension" problem. In response to this situation, the truncation technique [6] is proposed, which cut combinations of 0 -1 variables based on priority order [7]. Then a heuristic improvement of adjusting truncated window size according to the incremental load demands in adjacent hours is presented in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%