2017
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A father effect explains sex-ratio bias

Abstract: Sex ratio allocation has important fitness consequences, and theory predicts that parents should adjust offspring sex ratio in cases where the fitness returns of producing male and female offspring vary. The ability of fathers to bias offspring sex ratios has traditionally been dismissed given the expectation of an equal proportion of X-and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm (CBS) in ejaculates due to segregation of sex chromosomes at meiosis. This expectation has been recently refuted. Here we used Peromyscus leucopu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
45
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to gestation length and covering success, we found that secondary sex ratio had a negligible maternal heritable component (0.005) with a high standard error, indicating that genetic variation in the mare has no influence on the sex of the foal. However, paternal heritability estimates revealed an extremely small but Other studies in mammals have also found evidence of male-driven sex ratio bias [33,34]. However, in contrast to these studies, we found no association between the inbreeding level of the sire and offspring sex ratio [33,34].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to gestation length and covering success, we found that secondary sex ratio had a negligible maternal heritable component (0.005) with a high standard error, indicating that genetic variation in the mare has no influence on the sex of the foal. However, paternal heritability estimates revealed an extremely small but Other studies in mammals have also found evidence of male-driven sex ratio bias [33,34]. However, in contrast to these studies, we found no association between the inbreeding level of the sire and offspring sex ratio [33,34].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, paternal heritability estimates revealed an extremely small but Other studies in mammals have also found evidence of male-driven sex ratio bias [33,34]. However, in contrast to these studies, we found no association between the inbreeding level of the sire and offspring sex ratio [33,34]. It is postulated that higher quality, less inbred fathers produce more male offspring [35].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…While the upstream transcriptional regulators Slx and Sly are specific to the Palaearctic radiation of mouse species, their mode of action appears to involve interaction with Ssty, which is present more widely in rodents and has become independently amplified in rat, together with its X-linked homologue Sstx [13,68,69]. Together with data indicating the presence of paternally-mediated sex ratio skewing in an even more distantly related rodent species, Peromyscus [70], and the presence of sequences related to Ssty in the genomes of Ellobius species [71], this suggests that the genomic conflict may be much longer-standing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammals, research has focused almost entirely on mothers, partly due to the assumption that the male contribution is under meiotic control and partly due to the differential cost of reproduction with mothers investing more in their offspring than fathers. However, studies investigating the possibility of paternal adaptive sex allocation are increasing and may explain some of the reported inconsistencies in offspring SR (e.g., Edwards & Cameron, ; Malo et al, ; Vanthournout et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in sperm sex ratios (sperm SR) are likely to influence offspring SR but seminal fluids likely also play a vital role through cryptic male choice (Edwards & Cameron, ). Technological advances allow for a fast, cheap, and accurate analysis of sperm SR, which have now been recorded across a several taxa (e.g., Edwards & Cameron, ; Malo et al, ; Vanthournout et al, ). The mechanistic drivers of sperm SR biases remain understudied, but coital rate, environmental contaminants, and age are predicted to play a large role (Edwards & Cameron, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%