2008 IEEE 14th International Mixed-Signals, Sensors, and Systems Test Workshop 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ims3tw.2008.4581597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fault detection and diagnosis technique for digital microfluidic biochips

Abstract: With the miniaturized biochips finding applications in safety-critical applications dependability of these chips has become an important issue since the consequences of a malfunction of such as chip could be catastrophic. Thus, these chips have to be tested both after the manufacture as well as during field operations. In this paper we propose an integrated testing and diagnosis strategy for the digital microfluidic biochips that can locate single as well as a certain class of multiple defects. This can be use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it was difficult for a single droplet to move from source to sink consisting of very large arrays that involve thousands of electrodes. To tackle this issue, parallel testing approach was presented [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Parallel testing was introduced by Xu et al [ 27 ] in which parallel test droplets were routed on the electrode arrays.…”
Section: Testing Techniques For Conventional Digital Microfluidic mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it was difficult for a single droplet to move from source to sink consisting of very large arrays that involve thousands of electrodes. To tackle this issue, parallel testing approach was presented [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Parallel testing was introduced by Xu et al [ 27 ] in which parallel test droplets were routed on the electrode arrays.…”
Section: Testing Techniques For Conventional Digital Microfluidic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing time significantly reduced to approximately 75% of that required by the Euler test method due to the reduced complexity of fault diagnosis from O(N2) to O(N). Similarly, an integrated testing and diagnosis method was proposed by Davids et al [ 28 ] to locate single and multiple defects with high fault coverage without flooding. In this methodology, structural testing was used for the outer loop of microfluidic array and parallel testing was used for the inner arrays using multiple droplets.…”
Section: Testing Techniques For Conventional Digital Microfluidic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fluidic devices are connected using electrode paths for droplet routing, and other regions are left unused without any electrode. Previous testing methods target the detection of manufacturing defects in a 2-D regular microfluidic array [6,7,17,21,23,24,27]. In [6], efficient parallel testing and diagnosis algorithms are proposed to detect and locate single as well as multiple faults in a regular microfluidic array.…”
Section: Digital Microfluidic Platform and Related Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several testing methods have been proposed to detect defects in microfluidic biochips and twodimensional (2-D) regular microfluidic arrays [6,7,11,17,18,21,23,24,27]. In [21], faults were classified as being either catastrophic or parametric, and detected by electrically controlling and tracking the motion of test droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find a fault within a newly manufactured biochip, it is essential to route a set of test droplets to every edges and cells of entire biochip by controlling the voltage of the electrodes [7,9,[21][22][23]. If the device under test contains any defect, it is prerequisite to identify the defective electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%