2014 IEEE 20th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing 2014
DOI: 10.1109/prdc.2014.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fault Tolerant Architecture for Data Fusion Targeting Hardware and Software Faults

Abstract: This paper presents a fault tolerance architecture for data fusion mechanisms that tolerates hardware faults in the sensors and software faults in the data fusion. After introducing the basic concepts of fault tolerance and data fusion, we present first the generic architecture before detailing an implementation using Kalman filters for mobile robot localization. Finally fault injection is used on real data from this implementation to validate our architecture. Under a single fault hypothesis, we detect hardwa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common strategy for error detection in the sensor inputs of autonomous vehicles is based on duplication and comparison approaches and the use of belief functions, as defined by Smets in his Transferable Belief Model (TMB) [ 27 ]; i.e., assembling redundant localization algorithms aiming to compare the different outputs and expose the failing sensor or algorithm. Examples of such approaches can be found in [ 28 , 29 ], where redundant information is used to detect corrupted or erroneous data and obtain control signals that are further fused in a Kalman filter. Self-assessing Bayesian filters have also been proposed to merge different information sources and improve the robustness, as they implement an error detection system [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common strategy for error detection in the sensor inputs of autonomous vehicles is based on duplication and comparison approaches and the use of belief functions, as defined by Smets in his Transferable Belief Model (TMB) [ 27 ]; i.e., assembling redundant localization algorithms aiming to compare the different outputs and expose the failing sensor or algorithm. Examples of such approaches can be found in [ 28 , 29 ], where redundant information is used to detect corrupted or erroneous data and obtain control signals that are further fused in a Kalman filter. Self-assessing Bayesian filters have also been proposed to merge different information sources and improve the robustness, as they implement an error detection system [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos modelos consisten en diseñar una estructura con módulos de localización redundantes que comparan entre sí sus estimaciones para desenmascarar posibles errores, y poder así discriminarlos para evitar una propagación del error en el posicionamiento. [7] y [9] ofrecen ejemplos de aplicación para estos modelos, donde se usa información redundante para detectar fuentes erróneas antes de fusionarlas en un filtro de Kalman. Aun así, estos enfoques suelen centrarse solamente en la detección de errores, y en contadas ocasiones abordan la problemática de desarrollar alternativas de posicionamiento realmente precisas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Each observer is driven by all inputs and all but one output to diagnose a sensor fault. Additionally, in the very recent work from [21][22][23], the EKF is used to calculate the measurement probability distribution of the intelligent vehicle position for nonlinear models driven by Gaussian noise. Using the probability distribution of innovation obtained from EKF, it is possible to test if the measured data are fit with the models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%