Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2003. ISCAS '03.
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2003.1206396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fault tolerant hardware based file system manager for solid state mass memory

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results reported here show the capability of the system to have a graceful degradation of its performances in case of faults. This is a further feature of the system that exploits the concurrent error detection capability of the architecture to improve its performability [32], [33] for a given level of reliability.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results reported here show the capability of the system to have a graceful degradation of its performances in case of faults. This is a further feature of the system that exploits the concurrent error detection capability of the architecture to improve its performability [32], [33] for a given level of reliability.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the graceful degradation capability of our system allows different levels of acceptable performance; for example, the SSMM can be reconfigured to work also with less I/O link Interfaces and/or memory modules. Therefore the above evaluations can be considered as a worst case analysis of the system, while the probability that the SSMM keeps working at the end of mission with reduced performance is quite higher as explained in [32]. Analyzing the results in detail, we can notice that the reliability of the memory control for the RS (36,32) configuration is better than RS (72,64); however the latter can tolerate a larger number of memory package failures.…”
Section: A Solid State Mass Memory Reliability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%