2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2012.6187253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fault-tolerant programmable voter for software-based N-modular redundancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heavy fault-detection mechanisms (called HFD): with high fault-detection overheads but relatively high fault coverage. For this case we assumed that the system uses multiple fault-detection mechanisms based on code and data redundancy, arithmetic code, consistency check, and control flow checking [9], [10], [23], [24], [25], [26] to achieve high fault coverage for different fault types.…”
Section: Evaluation and Disscutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Heavy fault-detection mechanisms (called HFD): with high fault-detection overheads but relatively high fault coverage. For this case we assumed that the system uses multiple fault-detection mechanisms based on code and data redundancy, arithmetic code, consistency check, and control flow checking [9], [10], [23], [24], [25], [26] to achieve high fault coverage for different fault types.…”
Section: Evaluation and Disscutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that while both time and energy overheads of software faultdetection mechanisms are lower than the overhead of modular redundancy with result comparison (majority voting), the fault coverage of software mechanisms is not sufficiently high, unlike majority voting that provides high fault masking [9], [10], [23], [24], [26]. Furthermore, these software fault-detection mechanisms are application-specific so that each task requires its specific detection mechanism [9], [10], [25], [26], while result comparison and majority voting are general and can be used for any type of tasks without requiring any hardware modification or redesign [9], [10], [25].…”
Section: Light Fault-detection Mechanisms (Called Lfd): Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although, these methods have been successfully verified by theoretical analyses and engineering tests, all these methods are derived from accurate models that are difficult to obtain in practical engineering, especially for complicated ALVs. Besides, because dynamic models are often very complex, observer-based approach is impractical, time-consuming, requiring great process knowledge and effort [2]. Data-based analytical redundancy (soft sensor) is used whenever there is insufficient a priori knowledge about a process [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%