2019
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1700564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feasibility study of a home-based lifestyle-integrated physical exercise training and home modification for community-living older people (Part 2): the FIT-at-Home fall prevention program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple component interventions that include exercise programs are most effective in reducing falls and fall risk compared to programs that do not include an exercise component. 20 , 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple component interventions that include exercise programs are most effective in reducing falls and fall risk compared to programs that do not include an exercise component. 20 , 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised exercise programs can help overcome transport and high-cost barriers ( Schutzer and Graves, 2004 ) and can be independently integrated into everyday life ( Müller et al, 2021 ); preliminary evidence suggests digitally delivered exercise programs (e- and m-training programs) may provide beneficial impact on physical fitness in the elderly ( Jungreitmayr et al, 2021 ; Netz et al, 2021 ). In this context, and focusing on healthy retired women, Jungreitmayr et al examined whether an improvement of physical fitness and associated subdomains (i.e., muscular strength, balance, and flexibility) could be achieved following 14 weeks of an app-based, unsupervised exercise intervention, in which the exercise frequency and duration of sessions were self-selected.…”
Section: Usability and Effectiveness Of App-based Exercise Training I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although supervised exercise is often considered the superior method to deliver physical exercise ( Storer et al, 2014 ; Fennell et al, 2016 ), it is not inherently better than unsupervised programs, as those have their own advantages. Unsupervised exercise programs can overcome practical barriers ( Schutzer and Graves, 2004 ) such as transport and cost ( Yardley et al, 2006 ; Davis et al, 2010 ; Kim et al, 2012 ) and can be integrated independently into everyday life ( Geraedts et al, 2013 ; Müller et al, 2021 ). Additionally, there is preliminary evidence suggesting that unsupervised programs delivered using digital technologies (e.g., virtual reality, smartphone, or tablet apps) may have an impact on physical fitness in people of older age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%