2022
DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Feature Extraction Using Probabilistic Neural Network and BTFSC-Net Model with Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Classification

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Brain Tumor Fusion-based Segments and Classification-Non-enhancing tumor (BTFSC-Net) is a hybrid system for classifying brain tumors that combine medical image fusion, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification procedures. Materials and Methods: to reduce noise from medical images, the hybrid probabilistic wiener filter (HPWF) is first applied as a preprocessing step. Then, to combine robust edge analysis (REA) properties in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, 'n' refers to the number of filters, 'sf ' denotes the size of filters, 'sp' represents the size of the max pooling layer, and 'l' indicates the step size. Several other configurations, such as [8,7,4,3] and [9,8,2,4], also yielded high accuracies above 97%. However, certain configurations, e.g., [1,5,2,3] and [1,5,2,2], resulted in significantly lower accuracies of 84.20% and 50%, respectively.…”
Section: Optimization Results Obtained By the Pso-cnn Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here, 'n' refers to the number of filters, 'sf ' denotes the size of filters, 'sp' represents the size of the max pooling layer, and 'l' indicates the step size. Several other configurations, such as [8,7,4,3] and [9,8,2,4], also yielded high accuracies above 97%. However, certain configurations, e.g., [1,5,2,3] and [1,5,2,2], resulted in significantly lower accuracies of 84.20% and 50%, respectively.…”
Section: Optimization Results Obtained By the Pso-cnn Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The best accuracy obtained was 97.12% with the hyper-parameter values [n, s f , sp, l] = [12,5,3,2]. Configurations such as [8,5,3,4] and [12,7,4, 2] also yielded accuracies above 96%. However, the [1, 5, 2, 2] and [5,5,2,2] configurations resulted in lower accuracies of 82.40% and 60.53%, respectively.…”
Section: Optimization Results Obtained By the Pso-cnn Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations