2008
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A female songbird out-sings male conspecifics during simulated territorial intrusions

Abstract: While birdsong is a model system for animal communication studies, our knowledge is derived primarily from the study of only one sex and is therefore incomplete. The study of song in a role-reversed species would provide a unique opportunity to study selective pressures and mechanisms specific to females, and to test the robustness of current theories in an empirically novel manner. We investigated function of female song in stripe-headed sparrows (Aimophila r. ruficauda), a Neotropical, duetting passerine, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some species, including some monochromatic species, exhibit distinctive sex-specific songs or structural features (Mennill et al, 2005;Rogers, 2005;Logue et al, 2007). However, in other species, males and females have similar overall structure, but differ in a few, continuous parameters, such as frequency or number of syllables (Mennill et al, 2005;Brunton and Li, 2006;Illes and Yunes-Jimenez, 2009). Some of these species have fairly substantial differences in pitch or syllable number that even allows researchers to distinguish among males and females (Mennill et al, 2005).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Song Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some species, including some monochromatic species, exhibit distinctive sex-specific songs or structural features (Mennill et al, 2005;Rogers, 2005;Logue et al, 2007). However, in other species, males and females have similar overall structure, but differ in a few, continuous parameters, such as frequency or number of syllables (Mennill et al, 2005;Brunton and Li, 2006;Illes and Yunes-Jimenez, 2009). Some of these species have fairly substantial differences in pitch or syllable number that even allows researchers to distinguish among males and females (Mennill et al, 2005).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Song Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these species have fairly substantial differences in pitch or syllable number that even allows researchers to distinguish among males and females (Mennill et al, 2005). In still other species, males and females exhibit different levels of vocal complexity that may be indicative of selection for more elaborate songs in one sex over the other (Brunton and Li, 2006;Illes and Yunes-Jimenez, 2009). However, we suggest that troupials exhibit less sexually distinct songs than most previously examined species, supported by the substantial overlap of frequency and duration of their songs (Figure 3).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Song Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is these meta-parameters that determine the collective signal parameters and establish the particular style of a duet (Brumm and Slater 2007). Duet styles vary considerably between species, ranging from rather loose temporal associations such as in Stripe-headed Sparrows (Aimophila ruficauda), in which the female and male simply overlap their parts with no further coordination (Illes and Yunes-Jimenez 2009), to cases of a stimulus response type, where the phrase of one partner is answered by the phrase of the other [e.g. in the Whipbird Psophodes olivaceus (Rogers 2005)], to rapid antiphonal cycles where female and male fit their song elements precisely in the brief pauses between the elements of their partner [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%