1964
DOI: 10.1093/jee/57.4.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Study of Diapause, Diapause Control, and Population Dynamics of the Boll Weevil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have conjectured that feeding on bolls induces diapause in boll weevils (Lloyd et al., 1964, 1967; Graham et al., 1979), which, if true, could conceivably have influenced the results of this study. In this study, however, newly emerged, unfed female boll weevils were used and even those that consumed post‐bloom and young boll rinds or reproductive portions became gravid and had shorter longevities than square‐fed weevils, which fails to agree with the definition of diapause (Taub‐Montemayor et al., 1997) and the diapause characters set forth by Brazzel & Newsom (1959).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Some researchers have conjectured that feeding on bolls induces diapause in boll weevils (Lloyd et al., 1964, 1967; Graham et al., 1979), which, if true, could conceivably have influenced the results of this study. In this study, however, newly emerged, unfed female boll weevils were used and even those that consumed post‐bloom and young boll rinds or reproductive portions became gravid and had shorter longevities than square‐fed weevils, which fails to agree with the definition of diapause (Taub‐Montemayor et al., 1997) and the diapause characters set forth by Brazzel & Newsom (1959).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Knipling (1960a,b) theoretically predicted range of boll weevil population values and estimated populations increase at those possible levels from low values of 2.5-fold in unfavorable overwintering period to 5-fold as a moderate increase, and to 7.5-fold as a high increase in favorable cotton-growing period. Lloyd et al (1964) found the average rate of increase of boll weevil populations was close to Þve-fold per generation. Lloyd and Merkl (1961) suggested that the rate of oviposition is related to the density of the population.…”
Section: Overwintering Boll Weevil Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This deflection point was often the maximum observed for the season, ranging from 30 to lOO%, and usually occurred in late August through October. In some studies, the seasonal pattern of diapause was bimodal, mistakenly interpreted by Lloyd and Merkl (1961) and Lloyd et al (1964) to reflect the typical pattern of diapause among field populations.…”
Section: Fig 1 Percentages Of (A) Male and (B) Female Boll Weevils mentioning
confidence: 99%