2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element method to calculate geometrically necessary dislocation density: Accounting for orientation discontinuities in polycrystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dislocation density (δ) was calculated using the formula 56 , 57 : where δ represents the dislocation density and D is the crystallite size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dislocation density (δ) was calculated using the formula 56 , 57 : where δ represents the dislocation density and D is the crystallite size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement could be nearly 20-fold for high-quality EBSPs and down to 14% for fast acquisitions. FPM's more accurate crystal orientations would contribute to orientation-based characterization techniques, such as the GND density evaluation on each slip system [10]. 2.…”
Section: Acquisitions With Different Rotation Angles βmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though demanding in computing capacity, DI has proven very robust in the presence of high noise level [7] and able to distinguish phases of the same Bravais lattice and different lattice constants [8]. Several post-processing algorithms have been proposed to reduce the orientation indexation noise, such as the linear adaptation of smoothing splines filter [9], or a finite element framework to reduce orientation discontinuity [10]. Those filters result in lower estimations of geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) densities and a poorer spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%