Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95
DOI: 10.1109/acc.1995.533873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite memory observer structure of continuous descriptor systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…transfer functions [6,22], state-space models [5,3,2], or descriptor models e.g. [8,11]. Since DAE models cover all these classes of models, the methods presented in this paper are applicable to all the three previous cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…transfer functions [6,22], state-space models [5,3,2], or descriptor models e.g. [8,11]. Since DAE models cover all these classes of models, the methods presented in this paper are applicable to all the three previous cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and it must therefore hold that N H (s)F i (s) = 0 which is equivalent to (11). (2) there exist also signals x and z such that (1) is fulfilled.…”
Section: Theorem 3 Fault I Is Detectable In (1) If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained results show that finite memory observer can enhance the opportunity to extract the contained information about incipient faults in recent measurement and then increase the capability of timely fault alarm. Hereafter, such finite memory FD observer was extended to continuous descriptor systems in , where the residual sensitivity to fault was verified through a circuit network simulation. Later, robustness of finite memory FD observer against noises was further illustrated in by comparison with the generalized pseudo‐Bayesian first order approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, residual generation based on linear models is considered. Previous works on linear residual generation has primarily dealt with models on transfer function form (Gertler, 1998;Viswanadham et al, 1987), state space form (Frisk and Nyberg, 2001;Chow and Willsky, 1984;Chen and Patton, 1999), or descriptor form (Hou, 2000;Kratz et al, 1995). In contrast, the key result of this paper is that we consider all models that are described by any set of linear differentialalgebraic equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%