2012
DOI: 10.1075/avt.29.02ber
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A first glance at the role of length in production and perception of diphthongs before Dutch coda l

Abstract: have shown that in Dutch there is variation in the neutralization of tense and lax vowels before coda /. In this study, we will extend the scope of their investigation by examining the effect of coda / on preceding diphthongs. A pilot production experiment shows that diphthongs can be completely neutralized in this context and may become monophthongs. A perception experiment reveals that length serves as an important cue for listeners in the identification of vowels followed by dark I. Linguistics in the Nethe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dutch is spoken both in the Netherlands and in Flanders, the northern part of Belgium. In the Netherlands, a sound change is currently on-going whereby the tense mid vowels /eː,øː,oː/ are becoming diphthongs [ei,øy,ou] (van der Harst, 2011; van der Harst et al, 2014; Van de Velde, 1996; Zwaardemaker & Eijkman, 1924), except when followed by coda /l/ (realized as [ɫ], with optional vocalization in the Netherlands; van Reenen & Jongkind, 2000) or another approximant consonant (/r,υ,j/) in specific phonological configurations (Berns & Jacobs, 2012; Botma et al, 2012; Voeten, 2015). In addition, the original diphthongs /εi,œy,ɔu/ have begun to diphthongize more strongly in the Netherlands (Blankestein, 1994; Gerritsen & Jansen, 1980; Gussenhoven & Broeders, 1976; van Heuven et al, 2005; Jacobi, 2009; Mees & Collins, 1983; Stroop, 1992, 1998; Van de Velde, 1996; Voortman, 1994) except before coda /l/, while they diphthongize more weakly in Flanders (Van de Velde, 1996; Verhoeven, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutch is spoken both in the Netherlands and in Flanders, the northern part of Belgium. In the Netherlands, a sound change is currently on-going whereby the tense mid vowels /eː,øː,oː/ are becoming diphthongs [ei,øy,ou] (van der Harst, 2011; van der Harst et al, 2014; Van de Velde, 1996; Zwaardemaker & Eijkman, 1924), except when followed by coda /l/ (realized as [ɫ], with optional vocalization in the Netherlands; van Reenen & Jongkind, 2000) or another approximant consonant (/r,υ,j/) in specific phonological configurations (Berns & Jacobs, 2012; Botma et al, 2012; Voeten, 2015). In addition, the original diphthongs /εi,œy,ɔu/ have begun to diphthongize more strongly in the Netherlands (Blankestein, 1994; Gerritsen & Jansen, 1980; Gussenhoven & Broeders, 1976; van Heuven et al, 2005; Jacobi, 2009; Mees & Collins, 1983; Stroop, 1992, 1998; Van de Velde, 1996; Voortman, 1994) except before coda /l/, while they diphthongize more weakly in Flanders (Van de Velde, 1996; Verhoeven, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, empowering patients can facilitate fewer rehospitalisations and relatively fewer hospital visits, which will eventuate in the use of less carbon (Charmel and Frampton, 2008). Several studies have found that using metered dose inhalers in people with respiratory diseases increases carbon emissions over time (Wilkinson et al, 2019;Janson et al, 2020;Panigone et al, 2020;Kponee-Shovein et al, 2022;Wichers and Pieters, 2022). When possible, using alternatives such as powderfree inhalers or soft mist inhalers can reduce carbon emissions (Pernigotti et al, 2021).…”
Section: Erent Perspectives To Reduce Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 100 years or so (at least since Zwaardemaker & Eijkman, 1924), the nd tense mid vowels [eː,øː,oː] have changed into upgliding diphthongs [ei,øy,ou] ( Van de Velde, 1996;Voeten, 2020bVoeten, , 2015. In tandem with this phonetic change, a phonological change has taken place in these vowels: the diphthongal realizations lose their upglide before, among others, coda /l/ (Berns & Jacobs, 2012;Botma, Sebregts, & Smakman, 2012;Voeten, 2020bVoeten, , 2015 and /r/ within the same foot (Gussenhoven, 1993). This is true of both the newlydiphthongal tense mid vowels [ei,øy,ou] and the original diphthongs [ɛi,oey,ɔu], which shows that the tense mid vowels have not just changed phonetically, but also phonologically (Voeten, 2015).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%