2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A first-principles study on hydrogen in ZnS: Structure, stability and diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second structure, the Zn SA is positioned above an S atom (single layer Zn SAs/1T-MoS 2 , Model II). Compared to the normal length of Zn–S bonds (∼2.36 Å), both coordination structures yield elongated Zn–S bond lengths that are greater than 2.95 Å . Therefore, the formation of Zn SAs/1T-MoS 2 is predicted to be unfavorable for Models I and II with only a single layer of 1T-MoS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the second structure, the Zn SA is positioned above an S atom (single layer Zn SAs/1T-MoS 2 , Model II). Compared to the normal length of Zn–S bonds (∼2.36 Å), both coordination structures yield elongated Zn–S bond lengths that are greater than 2.95 Å . Therefore, the formation of Zn SAs/1T-MoS 2 is predicted to be unfavorable for Models I and II with only a single layer of 1T-MoS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Compared to the normal length of Zn−S bonds (∼2.36 Å), both coordination structures yield elongated Zn−S bond lengths that are greater than 2.95 Å. 65 Therefore, the formation of Zn SAs/1T-MoS 2 is predicted to be unfavorable for Models I and II with only a single layer of 1T-MoS 2 . Instead, two or more layers of 1T-MoS 2 are required to stabilize intercalated Zn SAs and properly investigate the catalytic effects of spatially confining Zn SAs within the microenvironment of the 1T-MoS 2 active sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond varying the choice of shallow-donor intercalant to be employed in the diffusion doping procedure, the composition of binary semiconductors can also affect the doping chemistry. Changes in the composition of the binary semiconductor can modulate the electronic and geometric aspects of the system, affecting the internal barriers to diffusion and, therefore, the trapping kinetics . For example, sulfide-based semiconductors may be better candidates for proton diffusion doping than oxides, because the SH bond is usually less strong than OH, leading to lower interaction potential between the intercalant and host lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%