2020
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2020.2966737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fixed-Point Based Distributed Method for Energy Flow Calculation in Multi-Energy Systems

Abstract: Energy flow calculation (EFC) plays an important role in steady-state analysis of multi-energy systems (MESs). However, the independent management of sub-energy systems (subsystems) poses a considerable challenge to solve the high-order nonlinear energy flow model due to the limited information exchange between these subsystems. In this paper, a fixed-point based distributed method is proposed for EFC in an electricity-gas-heating system. Firstly, the mathematical modeling of each subsystem with coupling units… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, there are two general ways to realize combined energy analysis of PG and HN: 1) integrate the models of PG and HN, and solve them as a whole; 2) decouple the PG and HN at the coupling facilities and solve each model separately (sometimes iteratively until a globally convergent solution is achieved). For the studies with the approximation HN models, integrated solution can be tractable if the iterative matrix is well-conditioned [23][24][25][26][27][28], while the decoupled way of solution can also see good performance [5,[29][30][31][32][33]. But for the PDE model after discretization, the decoupled way of solution is more achievable due to the problem scale of the discretized equations, which is adopted in [4,[6][7][8]22].…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, there are two general ways to realize combined energy analysis of PG and HN: 1) integrate the models of PG and HN, and solve them as a whole; 2) decouple the PG and HN at the coupling facilities and solve each model separately (sometimes iteratively until a globally convergent solution is achieved). For the studies with the approximation HN models, integrated solution can be tractable if the iterative matrix is well-conditioned [23][24][25][26][27][28], while the decoupled way of solution can also see good performance [5,[29][30][31][32][33]. But for the PDE model after discretization, the decoupled way of solution is more achievable due to the problem scale of the discretized equations, which is adopted in [4,[6][7][8]22].…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing domestic and international research on power grid CPS modeling has mainly focused on information and communication effects modeling [14][15][16][17][18][19], cyber-physical interaction modeling [20][21][22][23][24][25], and cyber-physical coupling process modeling [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference [31] proposed a coupling modeling method for a power CPS based on set theory according to the logical structure analysis of a power grid CPS. The reference [32][33] put forward modeling ideas and static modeling methods of information flow, and the reference [34][35] conducted related research on the modeling and quantitative analysis of information flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vein of distributed operation (namely without presence of a center), different methods are presented in various literature such as PDMM, ADMM, etc. In [10][11][12][13], some of these approaches in the operation of the network microgrids can be found. The alternating-direction method of multipliers (ADMM) approach is one of the most well-known ways of distributed operation that has several features [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the heat section, the CHP and boiler units are considered as the heat generation units which must supply the thermal demand. The heat balance is shown in (8) and the limits of heat units are provided by constraints (10) and (11). It is cristal clear that the consumed gas of the CHP and boiler units must be equated with the generation gas of the gas network which is represented by inspection (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%