2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flexible carbon counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
161
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
161
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These electrodes were then assembled in a symmetric sandwich cell configuration, and the impedance measurements were taken at biases from 0 to 0.8 V. As seen in Figure 5, R CT initially decreases exponentially with increasing bias as expected due to faster kinetics at higher overpotential. The thicker the FGS 13 layer, the lower the resistance at low bias; however, the impedance for all thicknesses collapses to a single curve at high voltages. Meanwhile, N pores decreases only slightly with bias since I Ϫ and I 3 Ϫ are similar in size and carry equal charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These electrodes were then assembled in a symmetric sandwich cell configuration, and the impedance measurements were taken at biases from 0 to 0.8 V. As seen in Figure 5, R CT initially decreases exponentially with increasing bias as expected due to faster kinetics at higher overpotential. The thicker the FGS 13 layer, the lower the resistance at low bias; however, the impedance for all thicknesses collapses to a single curve at high voltages. Meanwhile, N pores decreases only slightly with bias since I Ϫ and I 3 Ϫ are similar in size and carry equal charge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As detailed in the Experimental Methods Section, we fabricate FGS counter electrodes via thermolysis of surfactant and polymer in an FGSϪsurfactantϪpolymer network. Cells employing FGS 13 reach an efficiency () of 4.99%, which is more than 90% that of platinum-based cells ( ϭ 5.48%), where efficiency is defined as the cell's maximum power output divided by the input power from the . The fill factor (FF), the ratio of the maximum power obtainable in the device to the theoretical maximum power [FF ϭ (J* ϫ V*)/(J sc ϫ V oc ), where J* and V* are the current density and voltage, respectively, at the cell's maximum power output] is lower for the FGS 13 cells accounting for their lower efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk resistance, conductivity of a-Fe 2 O 3 and adhesive between a-Fe 2 O 3 and FTO substrate should be responsible for its higher R s . With respect to photovoltaic performance and EIS fitting data, it can be deduced that R ct of CEs is a major factor in the performance of DSCs, suggesting catalytic activity for triiodide reduction 30 . In Table 1, the R ct of a-Fe 2 O 3 is 2.3 O and this value is much smaller than the R ct of Pt (3.4 O), which may be one important cause that the energy-conversion efficiency of DSCs using a-Fe 2 O 3 CE is comparable to that of Pt CE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the ways explored to improve the efficiency of DSSCs have focused on upgrading the components of the solar cell to enhance photovoltage (V OC ) by varying (a) the supporting oxide, (b) the electrolyte which stabilizes the solar cell, and (c) the dyes which enhance the photocurrent [4,5]. Carbon in DSC electrodes has gained attention recently, for instance, flexible C to complete with Pt:FTOs [6], C:TiO 2 for photocatalysis [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introduction: Efficiency Improvement Efforts On Dye Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%