2010
DOI: 10.5194/hessd-7-1945-2010
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A flume experiment on the effect of constriction shape on the formation of forced pools

Abstract: A series of 18 flume runs were conducted in a 6-m long, 0.5-m wide recirculating flume with a bed gradient of 0.8% to determine the influence of obstruction shape on the formation and characteristics of forced pools. Six different-shaped obstructions were added to the flume with the maximum width of the obstruction held constant at 20 cm, which equaled a 40% constriction of flow. The obstruction shapes used included a square, a rectangle, a right triangle with the hypotenuse-facing upstream, a right triangle w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further experiments with different bend geometries would be required to physically verify these relationships. Width variations have been shown to influence the spontaneous formation of morphologic features such as pool and riffles by affecting the local acceleration and deceleration of flow in flume experiments (e.g., Chartrand, Jellinek, Hassan, & Ferrer‐Boix, 2018; Thompson & McCarrick, 2010), field observations (e.g., Thompson & Wohl, 2009), and numerical models (e.g., MacWilliams, Wheaton, Pasternack, Street, & Kitanidis, 2006). Therefore, channel width variation can be expected to also play a role in the spatial distribution of cover formation in semi‐alluvial channels through similar hydraulic mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further experiments with different bend geometries would be required to physically verify these relationships. Width variations have been shown to influence the spontaneous formation of morphologic features such as pool and riffles by affecting the local acceleration and deceleration of flow in flume experiments (e.g., Chartrand, Jellinek, Hassan, & Ferrer‐Boix, 2018; Thompson & McCarrick, 2010), field observations (e.g., Thompson & Wohl, 2009), and numerical models (e.g., MacWilliams, Wheaton, Pasternack, Street, & Kitanidis, 2006). Therefore, channel width variation can be expected to also play a role in the spatial distribution of cover formation in semi‐alluvial channels through similar hydraulic mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in a maximum channel width of 1.21 m, a minimum channel width of 0.52 m, a dimensional amplitude of A = 0.69 m ( A = 2 A c B 0 ), and a wavelength of width variations equaling λ c = 3.42 m ( L c = 2 πB 0 / λ c ). The minimum width was 60% of the average width, and this 40% constriction is in line with extensive field and experimental work suggesting riffles and pools emerge with constrictions ranging from 30% to 50% of the mean width (e.g., Caamano et al ., 2009; de Almeida & Rodriguez, 2011, 2012; Lisle, 1986; MacVicar & Roy, 2007a, 2007b; Nelson et al ., 2015; Thompson & Fixler, 2017; Thompson & McCarrick, 2010). The wavelength of width variations in our flume corresponds to a pool spacing of approximately four channel widths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; MacWilliams et al. ; MacVicar and Roy, ; Thompson and McCarrick, ; MacVicar and Rennie, ; MacVicar and Best, ; Chartrand et al. ).…”
Section: Morphodynamic Evolution Metrics At the Scale Of A Channel Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%