2010
DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-5-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A focus on intra-abdominal infections

Abstract: Complicated intra-abdominal infections are an important cause of morbidity and are frequently associated with poor prognosis, particularly in higher risk patients.Well defined evidence-based recommendations for intra-abdominal infections treatment are partially lacking because of the limited number of randomized-controlled trials.Factors consistently associated with poor outcomes in patients with intra-abdominal infections include increased illness severity, failed source control, inadequate empiric antimicrob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
1
160
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The APACHE II scoring system was used to describe the severity of the disease in this analysis, as it was in most other studies in this field. Originally devised as a score to predict mortality upon ICU admission and generally considered a good marker of severity in these patients, its value in peritonitis has recently been questioned because it does not take into account the effect of interventions that may alter physiologic paramaters [8]. Patients with mild-to-moderate cIAIs generally have APACHE II scores of < 10 that are not associated with high mortality risk [25,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The APACHE II scoring system was used to describe the severity of the disease in this analysis, as it was in most other studies in this field. Originally devised as a score to predict mortality upon ICU admission and generally considered a good marker of severity in these patients, its value in peritonitis has recently been questioned because it does not take into account the effect of interventions that may alter physiologic paramaters [8]. Patients with mild-to-moderate cIAIs generally have APACHE II scores of < 10 that are not associated with high mortality risk [25,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate source control and prompt, appropriate empiric treatment is essential to improve outcome [3,4,8] and to reduce mortality [9]. Fluoroquinolones, which are broad-spectrum antibiotics with favorable efficacy and safety profiles for the management of mild-to-moderate cIAIs either as monotherapy (moxifloxacin) or in combination therapy (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin), are recommended in the latest Surgical Infection Society (SIS)/ Infection Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for the treatment of mild-to-moderate infections [3,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lokalizasyona göre İAE'ye neden olan etkenler, çok ilaca dirençli mikroorganizmalar ve spesifik dirençli mikroorganizmalar için risk faktörleri Tablo 2, 3 ve 4'te verilmiştir [13][14][15][16] . Tablo 2.…”
Section: Mikrobiyal Risk Faktörleriunclassified
“…Tablo 2. Lokalizasyona göre intra-abdominal enfeksiyonlar ve etkenler [13][14][15][16] Enfeksiyon Etken [9] . Tüm hastalarda DM, ciddi kardiyopulmoner hastalık, immünsüpresyon, hastane başvurusundan önceki üç ay içinde beş gün ve daha uzun süre hastane yatışı ve/veya iki günden fazla antibiyotik kullanımı ve/ veya abdominal girişim varlığı mutlaka sorgulanmalıdır (AMMI, A-II) [6] .…”
Section: Mikrobiyal Risk Faktörleriunclassified
“…This bacterium, is known by its natural resistance to some antibiotics; large (Arias and Murray, 2012;Heintz et al, 2010;Sartelli, 2010). The biogenesis and biofilm formation ability also contribute to the treatment of infections caused by E. faecalis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%