DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87698-4_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Formal Approach for User Interaction Reconfiguration of Safety Critical Interactive Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the requirements for dependability of the interactive cockpits require taking into account possible failures of hardware and software calling for reconfiguration mechanisms (of the interactive system -moving required information from a faulty display to functioning one). The same holds for interaction technique reconfiguration in case of input devices failures (Navarre et al 2008).…”
Section: Connection With Formal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Lastly, the requirements for dependability of the interactive cockpits require taking into account possible failures of hardware and software calling for reconfiguration mechanisms (of the interactive system -moving required information from a faulty display to functioning one). The same holds for interaction technique reconfiguration in case of input devices failures (Navarre et al 2008).…”
Section: Connection With Formal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Lastly, variability and resonance can also occur through system failure occurs or operators errors. We aim at integrating previous work we have done in the area of systems reconfiguration [16] and systematic account for human error using task models [17] to address variability for all the components of the socio-technical system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of airplane control, for example, interface reconfiguration can be found in the literature [9,10]. The approach described is to observe people in safety critical situations using initial interfaces and derive helpful changes supporting better interaction.…”
Section: Recent Workmentioning
confidence: 99%