2011
DOI: 10.15365/joce.1404022013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Foundation for Reflection and Questioning: Philosophy Course Requirements in Teacher Education Programs at Selected Catholic Colleges and Universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In reviewing the available literature regarding philosophy of education courses across the United States to determine where, when, and how often such courses are required, we found that many undergraduate preservice teacher preparation programs at Catholic colleges and universities in the United States require candidates to take courses in philosophy (Mucci & Cranston-Gingras, 2011). Among these, some institutions include a free-standing philosophy of education course as an essential part of their preservice teacher requirements.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reviewing the available literature regarding philosophy of education courses across the United States to determine where, when, and how often such courses are required, we found that many undergraduate preservice teacher preparation programs at Catholic colleges and universities in the United States require candidates to take courses in philosophy (Mucci & Cranston-Gingras, 2011). Among these, some institutions include a free-standing philosophy of education course as an essential part of their preservice teacher requirements.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bunun ilk adımı ise, eğitsel felsefesini önce kendisinin tanımasını ve belki de ifade edebilmesini sağlamaktır. Bununla birlikte, eğitim felsefesi bir ders olarak öğretmen yetiştiren kurumlarda programın bir parçası olarak verilse de bu dersin çoğu zaman sınırlı bir anlayış oluşturduğu, içeriğin yetersiz kaldığı, yapılan araştırmalarda (Elisasser, 2008;Mucci, 2011) ortaya konmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının, eğitsel süreçlere yönelik düşünce ve uygulamalarını felsefi anlamda isimlendirebilir hale getirmektir.…”
Section: çAlışmanın Amacı Ve öNemiunclassified
“…Many undergraduate preservice teacher preparation programs at Catholic colleges and universities in the U.S. require candidates to take courses in philosophy (Mucci & Cranston-Gingras, 2011). Among these, some institutions include a free-standing philosophy of education course as an essential part of their preservice teacher requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gosselin (2007) emphasized the importance of philosophy of education courses for preservice teachers because 'they typically do not understand how philosophy of education fits into the grand narrative of philosophy as a discipline ' (p. 42). On the other hand, Mucci and Cranston-Gingras (2011) made the case for such courses by asserting that 'Philosophy courses pertaining to philosophy of education allow preservice teachers to begin to examine their own goals for teaching and how those goals will be accomplished through specific teaching methods ' (p. 386). In this study, we contend that the philosophy of education can help teacher candidates examine how their own knowledge, skills, and dispositions influence their behaviors and why they make certain decisions regarding their curriculum and teaching methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation