2014
DOI: 10.12973/jesr.2014.42.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing the inventory of educational thought and applications: Its validity and reliability analysis

Abstract: Öğretmenin eğitsel yaşantıda sorumluluklarını ve uygulamalarını tutarlı bir temelde yürütebilmesi için, eğitsel süreçlere yönelik düşünce ve inanışlarının da tutarlı olması gerekir. Bunun ilk adımı ise, eğitsel felsefesini önce kendisinin tanımasını ve belki de ifade edebilmesini sağlamaktır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının, eğitsel süreçlere yönelik düşünce ve uygulamalarını felsefi anlamda isimlendirebilir hale getirmesini sağlamaktır. Çalışma, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi'nde örenim gör… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The answers to the items on the scale ranged between "5-I am completely aware; 4-I am mostly aware; 3-I am moderately aware; 2-I am little aware; 1-I am not aware at all" (Yesilyurt, 2013a). Another data collection tool was the "Educational Thought and Applications Scale (ETAS)" developed by Kumral (2014). The items on the scale ranged between "5-I totally agree; 4-I mostly agree; 3-I am neutral; 2-I mostly disagree, and 1-I do not agree at all".…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The answers to the items on the scale ranged between "5-I am completely aware; 4-I am mostly aware; 3-I am moderately aware; 2-I am little aware; 1-I am not aware at all" (Yesilyurt, 2013a). Another data collection tool was the "Educational Thought and Applications Scale (ETAS)" developed by Kumral (2014). The items on the scale ranged between "5-I totally agree; 4-I mostly agree; 3-I am neutral; 2-I mostly disagree, and 1-I do not agree at all".…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realistic philosophical understanding, perennialism, and essentialism are components of the "traditional" sub-dimension. On the other hand, in the "contemporary" sub-dimension, the characteristics of a more pragmatic, existentialist and constructivist, progressive and reconstructive educational understanding and philosophy are determined (Kumral, 2014). Table 2 shows the number of items in the sub-dimensions of both scales and Crombach Alpha (α) reliability values.…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other fit index data are the following: RMSEA= .062, NFI= .97, CFI= .98, SRMR= .048, GFI= .85, AGFI= .83. EDU Scale of 42 questions has structural validity and scale reliability that enables to demonstrate opinions and practices of educators as "Traditional" and "Popular" (Kumral, 2014).…”
Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%