A framework for assessing the salience of landmarks for wayfinding tasks

Abstract

Background Landmarks play an important role for the understanding of and reasoning about physical large-scale space. Landmarks also play an important role in every day's spatial tasks, such as wayfinding and navigation. The property of being a landmark has so far been attributed to distinct objects, which are either well known or otherwise unique, such as the Eiffel Tower or a lighthouse on the shore. We propose a framework for the assessment of the landmarkedness of potential landmarks for wayfinding tasks, which is based on the relationship between observer, physical environment, and potential landmark. We argue that landmarkedness is not an inherent property of some object, but rather the result of this tri-lateral configuration. The basic idea is to use this configuration to define the individual components that contribute to the total salience of the object and integrate them in a coherent framework. Main contribution The framework considers two types of salience: (1) the perceptual salience, which describes the potential of a feature to capture a wayfinder's attention (attentional capture), and (2) the cognitive salience, which explains how strong attention is guided by the wayfinder (attentional orienting). The assessment of the perceptual salience is based on the salience of the incoming stimuli, the perceived concepts, and the spatial layout of a scene, while the cognitive salience considers the subjective importance of the object with respect to the individual's context and knowledge. The most general requirement of a landmark is that it must be salient in some sense. This requires that it contrast with the environment, either in terms of its attributes (i.e., color, texture, etc.), the status of the perceived concept (i.e., church or commercial building), or due to its spatial location with respect to the other objects in the scene (i.e., in the middle of town). Such contrast, however, is only perceivable if the potential landmark is visible from the observer's current point of view. Therefore, for assessing an object's landmarkedness, we consider attributes, objects, and relations to other visible objects only. In addition to the salience perceived from physical contrast, the cognitive abilities of the observer play an important role in selecting appropriate objects for reference. This subjective selection implies that the context, together with our knowledge, thoughts and preconceptions shape what we perceive and finally select as reference for making decisions, which directly influences the assessment of the relative importance or salience of potential landmarks. The assessment of the salience of potential landmarks, hence, needs to consider cognitive aspects, along with the perceptual stimuli. Implications The accurate assessment of the relative importance of geographic objects is a crucial aspect of many wayfinding-related tools and applications, such as route generation and description algorithms, navigation systems, or location-based services. The integration of appropriate landmarks in such app...

Navigating virtual mazes: The benefits of audiovisual landmarks

“…Third, in our experiment, participants had to perform a distracter task when they explored the virtual landmarks and corridors that they had to remember. This distracter task was primarily used because it was shown that multisensory memory effects were larger when such a task was employed [19]. When navigating the real world the benefits of multisensory presentation would be lower if such distracter tasks do not exist.…”

“…Landmarks are typically distinctive objects that stand out in the environment [18,19] and serve as reference points when we are following routes or when we need to determine where we are [4]. When navigating the real world, landmarks can be seen (e.g.…”

Working Memory, Cues, and Wayfinding in Older Women

“…In sighted people, visual cues such as landmarks (Golledge, 1999) are important for all aspects of environmental learning and navigation (Caduff & Timpf, 2007). Tom and Denis (2004), for example, showed that individuals learn and remember landmarks easier than street names when learning a new route, possibly due to the visual image that landmarks facilitate.…”

“…These studies and others (Evans, Brennan, Skorpanich, & Held, 1984;Goodman, Brewster, & Gray, 2005) indicate that older adults have more difficulty learning new environments and may be more dependent on salient environmental cues than younger adults. Caduff and Timpf (2007) also suggested that cues must be salient to be most effectively used for wayfinding and navigation. They further propose that overall salience is determined by three subsets of salience: perceptual, cognitive, and contextual.…”

“…To understand salience one must consider the cognitive abilities of the user as well as the demands of the wayfinding task (Caduff & Timpf, 2007). Working memory, a basic cognitive function, is involved in attending to, selecting, and remembering relevant environmental information.…”