2018
DOI: 10.5751/es-09623-230212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for conceptualizing and assessing the resilience of essential services produced by socio-technical systems

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Essential services such as electricity are critical to human well-being and the functioning of modern society. These services are produced by complex adaptive socio-technical systems and emerge from the interplay of technical infrastructure with people and governing institutions. Ongoing global changes such as urbanization and increasing prevalence of extreme weather events are generating much interest in strategies for building the resilience of essential services. However, much of the emphasis has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(127 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study comes alongside numerous other recent and ongoing efforts to develop ways of assessing resilience, using both quantitative and qualitative methods – or combinations of both – particularly as resilience ideas have prominently taken hold in international development and climate-related and humanitarian interventions, policies and discourses (Brown, 2016). Many of these efforts have focused on measuring or ‘pinning down’ resilience, such as through the development of specific indicators to measure resilience outcomes (Brown, 2016; Quinlan et al , 2015; Van der Merwe et al , 2018). Our approach differs in that it seeks not to measure resilience, but to learn more about the complex processes of resilience as an art of building capacities, as seen through the experiences and perspectives of individuals imaginatively immersed at the margins of food systems.…”
Section: A Combined Narrative and Interpretative Approach To Explorinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study comes alongside numerous other recent and ongoing efforts to develop ways of assessing resilience, using both quantitative and qualitative methods – or combinations of both – particularly as resilience ideas have prominently taken hold in international development and climate-related and humanitarian interventions, policies and discourses (Brown, 2016). Many of these efforts have focused on measuring or ‘pinning down’ resilience, such as through the development of specific indicators to measure resilience outcomes (Brown, 2016; Quinlan et al , 2015; Van der Merwe et al , 2018). Our approach differs in that it seeks not to measure resilience, but to learn more about the complex processes of resilience as an art of building capacities, as seen through the experiences and perspectives of individuals imaginatively immersed at the margins of food systems.…”
Section: A Combined Narrative and Interpretative Approach To Explorinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root of organisational resilience is traceable to the Latin word resiliere -"the material characteristic of bouncing back after a setback" (Giustiniano et al 2018: 3). The three main perspectives of organisational resilience evident in literature hinge on impact resistance and recovery, adaptation, and anticipation (Connelly et al 2017, Lengnick-Hall, Beck and Lengnick-Hall 2011, Van der Merwe, Biggs and Preiser 2018.…”
Section: Overview Of Organisational Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex-adaptive systems (Table 1) challenge the capability of the human agent to make sense of the system behaviour and to act appropriately because often these systems change simultaneously at various scales, coupled with cascading cause-effects relations [1,2,[15][16][17]. Therefore, complex-adaptive SES bind agents in a joint struggle for control [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework: Complex-adaptive Social-ecological Smentioning
confidence: 99%