2007 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications 2007
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2007.4394611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Constructing Reconfigurable Mobile Terminal Architectures

Abstract: This paper focuses on the problem mobile terminals face when different protocols operate for providing the same service between visited access networks. Examples of such services are mobility management and QoS signaling. This plethora of protocols can restrict a mobile terminal from using the offered service since it might not be equipped with the appropriate software. This problem can be solved with the use of software reconfiguration. We present a framework for constructing mobile terminal architectures cap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is intuitive that frequent reconfigurations for the terminal should be performed in order to increase its adaptation to the changes of radio network environment. However, frequent reconfigurations in terminal's side also lead to higher blocking rate, to signaling overhead between terminal and network [12], [13], and introduce more processing delays [14]. Furthermore, if the reconfigurations are required in higher layers such as transport and application layers in IP-based networks, signaling overhead between network entities and processing delays should be considered [15]- [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is intuitive that frequent reconfigurations for the terminal should be performed in order to increase its adaptation to the changes of radio network environment. However, frequent reconfigurations in terminal's side also lead to higher blocking rate, to signaling overhead between terminal and network [12], [13], and introduce more processing delays [14]. Furthermore, if the reconfigurations are required in higher layers such as transport and application layers in IP-based networks, signaling overhead between network entities and processing delays should be considered [15]- [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%