Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2005.1574375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Fault-Tolerance in HLA-Based Distributed Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another checkpoint-based approach involving the structured high-level architecture (HLA) is presented in Eklof et al [2005]. In this case, checkpoints are stored in a universal stable storage repository by the federates, and several new publish-subscribe interactions are added to model checkpoint-related communications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another checkpoint-based approach involving the structured high-level architecture (HLA) is presented in Eklof et al [2005]. In this case, checkpoints are stored in a universal stable storage repository by the federates, and several new publish-subscribe interactions are added to model checkpoint-related communications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from global consistent checkpoints, local checkpoints are taken by federates independently without the coordination with other federates in the federation. Fault tolerance mechanisms relying on the local checkpoints of federates were proposed in [25], [26], [27]. These mechanisms are based on the traditional federate architecture.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRC keeps the connection to the federation and the federate failure can be recovered without interrupting the execution of other federates in the federation. Furthermore, the fault tolerance mechanisms in [25], [26], [27] only support the optimistic synchronization scheme, whereas our proposal allows federates to employ either conservative or optimistic synchronization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is expensive to take a global consistent checkpoint due to the coordination among federates in the federation. Crash-stop fault tolerant mechanisms were also proposed in [22], [23], [24] relying on federates' local checkpoints. These mechanisms are based on the traditional federate architecture.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%