2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
143
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
143
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In that sense, conserving biodiversity and securing local livelihoods could be an indirect result of REDD+ investments, although the focus on carbon capture still seems to predominate. There is widespread concern that biodiversity has not been given adequate consideration in the REDD+ process, increasing the possibility of negative environmental impacts (Gardner et al, 2012;McDermott et al, 2012;O'Connor, 2008). At the international level, project monitoring and evaluation are currently geared to carbon levels and, it is argued, it will be difficult to achieve REDD+ without developing criteria and principles to evaluate the conservation and sustainabilitypromoting features of the projects (Rosendal and Andresen, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that sense, conserving biodiversity and securing local livelihoods could be an indirect result of REDD+ investments, although the focus on carbon capture still seems to predominate. There is widespread concern that biodiversity has not been given adequate consideration in the REDD+ process, increasing the possibility of negative environmental impacts (Gardner et al, 2012;McDermott et al, 2012;O'Connor, 2008). At the international level, project monitoring and evaluation are currently geared to carbon levels and, it is argued, it will be difficult to achieve REDD+ without developing criteria and principles to evaluate the conservation and sustainabilitypromoting features of the projects (Rosendal and Andresen, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cancun Agreement provided guidance for safeguarding biodiversity by requiring that REDD+ actions do not result in the conversion of natural forests to plantations, but instead be used to incentivize the conservation of natural forests and their ecosystem services, and enhance environmental benefits (UNFCCC 2011). Although a step in the right direction, the wording was considered too general and not operational (Gardner et al 2012;Grussu et al 2014). Despite the evolution of international safeguard discussions since Cancun, safeguards for biodiversity and other non-carbon benefits remain vague (Pistorius and Reinecke 2013).…”
Section: Realizing the Delivery Of Biodiversity Co-benefits In Redd+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REDD+ has the potential to tackle these two major challenges simultaneously. As deforestation and forest degradation directly affect natural habitats (Sangermano et al 2012), then if REDD+ can slow deforestation and forest degradation, it should, in theory, benefit biodiversity conservation in tropical forests (Gardner et al 2012). Future REDD+ financing could offer an opportunity to supplement the current shortfall in conservation funding (Waldron et al 2013) or fund forest conservation at a scale that…”
Section: Read This Brief If…mentioning
confidence: 99%