“…Second, it is the net amount of stress increment (Δ σ 1 = σ 1 − σ 1, 0 ) in a volume element (dV) from initial yielding state ( σ 1 = σ 1, 0 ) to the instant stress state ( σ 1 ) at a given load, rather than the amplitude of the instant stress ( σ 1 ), that contributes to the risk of cleavage fracture. Accordingly, by adopting a 3‐parameter Weibull distribution density function of microscopic cleavage fracture stress S in place of the power law distribution of microcrack size (a) (Equation 9 in Table ) as assumption (5), a new local approach to cleavage fracture was proposed: where σ W is the Weibull stress. Note that the essential difference between Equations and 3 lies in that <...>…”