2015
DOI: 10.1118/1.4922403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for the correction of slow physiological drifts during MR‐guided HIFU therapies: Proof of concept

Abstract: This study proposes a motion correction strategy for displacements resulting from slowly varying physiological motion that might occur during a MR-guided HIFU intervention. The authors have shown that such drifts can lead to a misalignment between interventional planning, energy delivery, and therapeutic validation. The presented volunteer study and in vivo experiment demonstrate both the relevance of the problem for HIFU therapies and the compatibility of the proposed motion compensation framework with the wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(59 reference statements)
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in good correspondence with previous reportings [13, 45, 46]. Additionally, a rather large inter-subject variability was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in good correspondence with previous reportings [13, 45, 46]. Additionally, a rather large inter-subject variability was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The main limit of the respiratory gating used in this work is that it does not correct for other motion sources such as heart beats and physiologic motion. A solution developed in MR-guided HIFU treatment is to use electronic beam steering for 3D motion compensation to remain within the targeted site whatever the motion is (Ries et al 2010; Zachiu et al 2015). This would require capability of tracking the target in real-time and in 3D, as well as adapting the focal position at a high temporal and spatial resolution with a low tracking latency to limit errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we used a method specifically designed for MR images with improved robustness to image intensity fluctuations as described previously . The method has previously been validated in MRI for high‐frequency ultrasound . Unlike classical optical flow methods, it uses an L1 optical flow data fit term and an L2 regularizer (ie, an L1–L2 model): Ixu+Iyv+Izw+It2em+β2()u22+v22+w220.25emitalicdxdydz …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The method has previously been validated in MRI for high-frequency ultrasound. 29 Unlike classical optical flow methods, it uses an L1 optical flow data fit term and an L2 regularizer (ie, an L1-L2 model) 28 :…”
Section: Estimation Of Breathing-induced Deformation Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%