2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework of an anisotropic elastoplastic model for clays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These soils were characterized by an enhanced anisotropic bounding surface model with associative [17] and non-associative [11,12] flow rules. This model was implemented into the PLAXIS computer program [26] for the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These soils were characterized by an enhanced anisotropic bounding surface model with associative [17] and non-associative [11,12] flow rules. This model was implemented into the PLAXIS computer program [26] for the analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sites are modeled and simulated using the small strain finite element method. The soft cohesive soils found at these sites are characterized by an enhanced anisotropic bounding surface model with associative [17] and nonassociative [11,12] flow rules that is implemented into the PLAXIS computer program [26] as part of this study. The results of the simulations are critically assessed with relation to field observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elliptical yield surface of the MCC model has been modified in numerous past studies to achieve better model performance in predicting the undrained shear strength of soils (see, Yu 1998;Pestana and Whittle 1999;Ling et al 2002;Yin et al 2002;Collins 2005;Dafalias et al, 2006;Yin and Chang 2009;Jiang and Ling 2010;Yao et al 2011). We employ herein the   yield surface proposed by Collins (2005) as the bounding surface ( and  are two parameters controlling the shape of the surface) to model the behavior of OC clay.…”
Section: Bounding Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many simulations, however, were based on relatively simple constitutive models that might not have the capability to realistically describe ground movements due to complex characteristics of soils. For this reason, advanced bounding surface models (Ling et al, 2002;Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012) have recently been used in finite element excavation analyses. This paper describes the use of enhanced anisotropic bounding surface models with associative (Ling et al, 2002) and non-associative flow rules (Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012), in conjunction with the PLAXIS computer program for simulating ground movements associated with deep excavations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, advanced bounding surface models (Ling et al, 2002;Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012) have recently been used in finite element excavation analyses. This paper describes the use of enhanced anisotropic bounding surface models with associative (Ling et al, 2002) and non-associative flow rules (Jiang and Ling, 2010;Jiang et al, 2012), in conjunction with the PLAXIS computer program for simulating ground movements associated with deep excavations. The proper implementation of the models into PLAXIS was first validated against undrained isotropic and anisotropic triaxial test results under compression and extension shearing modes for various cohesive soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%