2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333) 2002
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2002.997238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework on gigabit rate packet header collection for low-cost Internet monitoring system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the result obtained in Ref. 28 and in other publications, this can be effectively achieved by a PC equipped with PCI-X/Express, for example. It should also be noted …”
Section: Impact Of Group Number Increasementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the result obtained in Ref. 28 and in other publications, this can be effectively achieved by a PC equipped with PCI-X/Express, for example. It should also be noted …”
Section: Impact Of Group Number Increasementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The IGMP/PIM processing time in each router for backup setting, and the delay from IGMP transmission to (B, Gb1/Gb2) packet arrival (multicast join latency: tree construction time) were measured 10 times each by using a packet capture system [28] with 1-µs timestamp resolution. Table 2 shows the test results.…”
Section: Multicast Tree Construction Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of main groups varies from 1 to 3, i.e. join latency values of a maximum of 3 pairs of backup groups (6 groups in total) are measured using our proprietary passive GbE monitor providing accuracy to the microsecond [23]. In all cases, UDP clients can receive (M, Gm) the packets proxy distributed from the multicast gateway.…”
Section: B Backup Multicast Group Join Latencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HostID: 15 bytes UMAC value: 4 bytes This means that each outgoing IP packet length will be increased by 19 bytes, which approximately 0.0125 of the maximum Ethernet packet (The Ethernet maximum packet length is 1514 bytes). Since, no packet must exceed the Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) of the network [21,22,23], in this case (Ethernet), therefore, the MTU must be decreased by the total length of the extended information which is 19 bytes.…”
Section: Maximum Transfer Unit (Mtu)mentioning
confidence: 99%