2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework to assess the development and capacity of non-profit agencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…c) Financial sustainability. High capacity organizations have long-term financial sustainability plans that include diversifying funding sources and developing fund-raising expertise within the organization (Schuh & Leviton, 2006;Stevens & Peikes, 2006). An improvement in financial sustainability was noted among the informant organizations during this three-year study.…”
Section: ) "Our Strategic Plan Is a Work In Progress We've Identifimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…c) Financial sustainability. High capacity organizations have long-term financial sustainability plans that include diversifying funding sources and developing fund-raising expertise within the organization (Schuh & Leviton, 2006;Stevens & Peikes, 2006). An improvement in financial sustainability was noted among the informant organizations during this three-year study.…”
Section: ) "Our Strategic Plan Is a Work In Progress We've Identifimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The measurement of personal outcomes, individual support needs, and performance indicators provides the basis for an organization‐level internal evaluation system . The advantages of such a system are that it: (1) leads to organization learning; (2) enhances the ability to manage program quality and sustain efficiency; (3) provides the basis for a theory of change that becomes the guide whereby the organization structures its daily activities to achieve its strategic goals and objectives; and (4) provides the framework within which each organization can examine what works and what does not work within its own programming and manage performance for continuous improvement (Hunter, 2006; Schuh & Leviton, 2006).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is claimed that NGOs are often perceived as institutions that consult from a distance, which leads to difficulties in coordination with partners, duplicity of projects and a lack of optimization in the use of resources (Bontenbal, 2009). Most importantly, it is argued that, even though assessing the capacities of NGOs is vital for an effective implementation of their programmes, NGOs give limited formal consideration to organizational capacity assessments (Schuh and Leviton, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%