2020
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A functional analysis of Carabelli trait in Australian aboriginal dentition

Abstract: Objectives: Carabelli is a nonmetric dental trait variably expressed as a small pit to a prominent cusp in the maxillary molars of modern humans. Investigations on the occurrence and expression rates of this trait have been conducted extensively, tracing its origin to genetic sources. However, there remains a lack of understanding about its potential role in chewing. In this study, we examine molar macrowear with the aim of reconstructing Carabelli trait occlusal dynamics occurring during chewing. Methods: We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Wear contacts have been labelled following the numbering system created by Maier & Schneck [ 30 ] and grouped by chewing cycle phases [ 31 , 32 ]: Buccal phase I (areas 1, 1.1, 2, 2.1, 3 and 4; coloured in blue), Lingual phase I (areas 5, 5.1, 6, 6.1, 7 and 8; coloured in green) and Phase II (areas 10, 11, 12 and 13; coloured in red). CA1 upper ( a ) and lower ( b ) arches, age E 8.07 years; CA4 upper ( c ) and lower ( d ) arches, age E 12.44 years; CA9 upper ( e ) and lower ( f ) arches, age E 17.44 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Wear contacts have been labelled following the numbering system created by Maier & Schneck [ 30 ] and grouped by chewing cycle phases [ 31 , 32 ]: Buccal phase I (areas 1, 1.1, 2, 2.1, 3 and 4; coloured in blue), Lingual phase I (areas 5, 5.1, 6, 6.1, 7 and 8; coloured in green) and Phase II (areas 10, 11, 12 and 13; coloured in red). CA1 upper ( a ) and lower ( b ) arches, age E 8.07 years; CA4 upper ( c ) and lower ( d ) arches, age E 12.44 years; CA9 upper ( e ) and lower ( f ) arches, age E 17.44 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we generated high-resolution physical replicas of the digital models via stereolithography, since 3D prints can be more helpful when trying to identify qualitative details, such as cusp morphology, fissure patterns and wear areas than a two-dimensional photograph or a 3D model viewed on a screen [ 30 ]. Furthermore, we tested the presence of tooth-to-tooth occlusal contact in the intercuspal position between upper and lower teeth using an 8 μm Shimstock Foil (Coltene ™ ) [ 31 ] that was inserted between 3D prints of upper and lower dental arches [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 49.7% of the population who showed shovel and Carabelli features belonged to the Chinese population. The fifth cusp (Carabelli cusp) prevalence in the maxillary molars in 41.7% of school children in Saudi Arabia was observed [17]. According to the well-known paleontologist William King Gregory (1922), there was not much variation in tooth crown shape between the various human groups [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These descriptions of the occlusal surface aim to further contribute to paleodietary reconstruction as dental macrowear patterns are known to differ between hunter‐gatherers and agrarian populations (Rose & Ungar, 1998 ; B. H. Smith, 1984 ; Watson & Schmidt, 2020 ). Quantitative methods describing wear patterns such as OFA (occlusal fingerprint analysis) (Kullmer et al, 2009 ), are especially suited to study the biomechanics of both deciduous and permanent teeth (Fiorenza et al, 2020 ; Fung et al, 2021 ); however, such studies are more time consuming are require more specialized equipment. The measurements proposed in this study could likely be adapted to describe dental macrowear patterns, by, for example, dividing the occlusal surface into quadrants or measuring multiple intercusp slope angles and calculating ratios between them, however, it is uncertain how useful such an approach would be given the success of existing methods for describing dental macrowear patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%