This paper presents a response to five commentaries on our article An Analysis ofAutism as a ContingencyShapedDisorder of Verbal Behavior (Drash & Tudor, 2004). One ofthe principal objectives ofthat article is to provide the behavior analysis community and the autism community with a conceptual basis for analyzing autism as a behavioral disorder rather than a neurological disorder. This analysis provides a logical and testable behavioral answer to the question ofthe etiology of autism, a question that has baffled scientists and researchers for more than half a century. Elements ofthe original article with which reviewers expressed concern include: need for more data, need for greater emphasis on neurological and epidemiological factors in autism, the relative importance of verbal behavior as a core deficit of autism, and disruptive and avoidant behavior as a primary variable in the etiology of autism. We provide a behavioral response to each of these concerns. We also show how our analysis will provide a conceptual foundation for behavior analysis to begin developing urgently needed programs for prevention and earlier intervention in autism.
A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS iN AUTISMIn our article "An Analysis of Autism as a Contingency-Shaped Disorder of Verbal Behavior" (Drash & Tudor, 2004) we presented a theoretical analysis that demonstrated how contingencies ofreinforcement operating between caregiver and infant during the first year to 18 months ofany typical infant's life might shape a repertoire ofbehaviors that could later result in a diagnosis of autism. We also presented six specific reinforcement paradigms that could theoretically prevent the acquisition of verbal behavior and other social behaviors and shape the spectrum of behaviors that might later result in a diagnosis of autism.One of the major objectives of our article is to provide the behavior analysis community with a conceptual basis for viewing autism primarily as a behavioral disorder rather than a neurobiological or genetic disorder. This analysis provides a logical and testable behavioral answer to the question of the etiology of autism, a question that has baffled scientists and researchers for more than half a century. Such a conceptualization will, we believe, provide a foundation for behavior analysis to begin developing an experimental analysis of the acquisition ofverbal behavior during the first year of life and to move forward with urgently needed programs for prevention and earlier intervention in autism.RESPONSE TO FIVE COMMENTARIES Malott (2004) has provided a very insightful and highly supportive commentary in which he indicates substantial agreement with our analysis. We have referenced a number of his comments in our response. Carr and LeBlanc (2004) agree that a behavioral analysis of autistic behavior might lead to technological advances such as behavioral prevention efforts, nationwide screening networks, and earlier treatment delivery that would not be possible based on a purely neurological explanatio...