2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A functional-analytic model of analogy using the Relational Evaluation Procedure

Abstract: Analogical reasoning is conceptualized by Relational Frame Theory as responding in accordance with an equivalence relation between equivalence or other types of derived stimulus relations. The purpose of this study was to provide an empirical demonstration of analogy using the Relational Evaluation Procedure (REP) , a recently developed technique for the rapid training and testing of derived stimulus relations. The experiment involved 9 stages in which 5 adult male subjects were exposed to a complex series of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, several researchers have developed alternative novel methodologies for establishing derived relations, such as stimulus pairing (e.g., Barnes, Smeets, & Leader, 1996;Fields, Doran, & Marroquin, 2009;Fields, Reeve, varelas, Rosen, & Belanich, 1997;Layng & Chase, 2001), a go/no-go procedure (e.g., Cullinan, Barnes-Holmes, & Smeets, 2001;Debert, Matos, & McIlvane, 2007), and simultaneous discrimination techniques (e.g., McIlvane, Kledaras, Callahan, & Dube, 2002;Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & Cullinan, 2000). one highly novel alternative methodology is the Relational evaluation Procedure (ReP; Cullinan et al, 2001; o'Hora, Barnes-Holmes, Roche, & Smeets, 2004;Stewart, Barnes-Holmes & Roche, 2004; see also Barnes-Holmes, Hayes, Dymond, & o'Hora, 2001, for a detailed outline). The purpose of the ReP is to assess participant reports on the relations between stimuli presented in pairs, rather than to control selection of the relata themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several researchers have developed alternative novel methodologies for establishing derived relations, such as stimulus pairing (e.g., Barnes, Smeets, & Leader, 1996;Fields, Doran, & Marroquin, 2009;Fields, Reeve, varelas, Rosen, & Belanich, 1997;Layng & Chase, 2001), a go/no-go procedure (e.g., Cullinan, Barnes-Holmes, & Smeets, 2001;Debert, Matos, & McIlvane, 2007), and simultaneous discrimination techniques (e.g., McIlvane, Kledaras, Callahan, & Dube, 2002;Smeets, Barnes-Holmes, & Cullinan, 2000). one highly novel alternative methodology is the Relational evaluation Procedure (ReP; Cullinan et al, 2001; o'Hora, Barnes-Holmes, Roche, & Smeets, 2004;Stewart, Barnes-Holmes & Roche, 2004; see also Barnes-Holmes, Hayes, Dymond, & o'Hora, 2001, for a detailed outline). The purpose of the ReP is to assess participant reports on the relations between stimuli presented in pairs, rather than to control selection of the relata themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFT has proven itself successful so far in modeling the nature, acquisition, and impact of higher cognition at the behavioral, emotional, and neurobiological level. For example, RFT researchers have successfully modeled analogy and metaphor (Stewart, Barnes-Holmes, & Roche, 2004), trained perspective taking (xx), ad RFT tasks can successfully model the natural language tasks studied in basic cognitive science, such as semantic priming (Bissett & Hayes, 1999;Barnes-Holmes. Xxx 2003) or xxx.…”
Section: Act Theoretical Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, two identical shapes might be presented with the relational terms "Same" and "Opposite," and participants are required to indicate, typically without time pressure, that the relation is "Similar." The REP has now been used across a range of studies to examine reasoning and other forms of higher cognition (O'Hora, Barnes-Holmes, Roche, & Smeets, 2004;O'Hora, Peláez, & BarnesHolmes, 2005;Stewart, Barnes-Holmes, & Roche, 2002, 2004. Critically, the REP provided the basis for the development of the IRAP, which is basically a combination of the IAT and the REP (see Barnes-Holmes et al, 2006;BarnesHolmes, Hayden, Barnes-Holmes, & Stewart, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%