2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13214274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fusion Method of Optical Image and SAR Image Based on Dense-UGAN and Gram–Schmidt Transformation

Abstract: To solve the problems such as obvious speckle noise and serious spectral distortion when existing fusion methods are applied to the fusion of optical and SAR images, this paper proposes a fusion method for optical and SAR images based on Dense-UGAN and Gram–Schmidt transformation. Firstly, dense connection with U-shaped network (Dense-UGAN) are used in GAN generator to deepen the network structure and obtain deeper source image information. Secondly, according to the particularity of SAR imaging mechanism, SGL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Image registration is based on the panchromatic image, and the multispectral image is registered by automatic point selection and manual modification. The Gram-Schmidt (GS) fusion method ( Grochala & Kedzierski, 2017 ; Kong et al, 2021 ; Yilmaz et al, 2020 ), which not only maintains the spectral information of the original image but also retains the spatial texture of the panchromatic band image to the greatest extent, was employed to fuse panchromatic and multispectral image data. The spatial resolution of the multispectral bands was 2.1 m after GS fusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image registration is based on the panchromatic image, and the multispectral image is registered by automatic point selection and manual modification. The Gram-Schmidt (GS) fusion method ( Grochala & Kedzierski, 2017 ; Kong et al, 2021 ; Yilmaz et al, 2020 ), which not only maintains the spectral information of the original image but also retains the spatial texture of the panchromatic band image to the greatest extent, was employed to fuse panchromatic and multispectral image data. The spatial resolution of the multispectral bands was 2.1 m after GS fusion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10: Relative performance gain analysis. Approaches dealing with Data Noise: NSCT [95], HRO [97], PIQE [98], ACL-CNN [99], HS2P [9]. Approaches dealing with Label Noise: tRNSL [102], NTDNE [103], AF2GNN [105], RSSC-ETDL [106], CSHLC [107], I-FPFN-EM [108], FFCTL [109], RS-COCL-NLF [110], RVgg19 [111].…”
Section: A Data Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present section, the proposed work is compared with different fusion methods starting from traditional to advanced deep learning-based algorithms including guided GFF [45], DWT [46], NSCT [47], multi-focus based on gradient image fusion (MWGF) [48], fast filtering image fusion (FFIF) [49], convolutional neural network based on general architecture (IFCNN) [50], and image fusion based on dense blocks (DenseFuse) [51]. Further, the proposed results are compared with two hybrid neural network architectures such as U-GAN + Gram Schmidt transform (U-GAN+GST) [52], and GAN + Non-local means (GAN+NLM) [53] to show the success of the proposed work. Figure 7, Figure 9, Figure 10, and Figure 11 represents the model outcomes of the dataset described in section 3.1.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%