IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Game Theoretic Framework for Distributed Self-Coexistence Among IEEE 802.22 Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume exclusive spectrum sharing in our model, i.e., each 802.22 secondary network can use the spectrum band only if it is free interference of other secondary networks. This can be achieved via the 802.22 selfcoexistence mechanism as presented in [25]. Thus, n out of N spectrum bands are concurrently used by the 802.22 secondary networks.…”
Section: B Attack Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume exclusive spectrum sharing in our model, i.e., each 802.22 secondary network can use the spectrum band only if it is free interference of other secondary networks. This can be achieved via the 802.22 selfcoexistence mechanism as presented in [25]. Thus, n out of N spectrum bands are concurrently used by the 802.22 secondary networks.…”
Section: B Attack Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33], the self-coexistence of multiple overlapping IEEE 802.22 networks operated by multiple wireless service providers that compete for resources and try to seek a spectrum band without any interference from other coexisting IEEE 802.22 networks, was investigated from a game theoretic perspective. The dynamic channel switching was modeled as a distributed modified minority game (MMG), in which each user has to decide whether to leave a particular band or to continue using it when another user also appears in the same band.…”
Section: Applications Of Game Theory In Spectrum Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The payment selection game among secondary users in [36] however is a non-cooperative game. For self coexistence among secondary users, while [33] proposes a non-cooperative dynamic channel switching game, [19] considers a cooperative approach for channel allocation. On the other hand, [34] considers a non-cooperative framework and a pricing based cooperative approach for self coexistence of secondary users.…”
Section: Classification Of Related Work Based On Issues and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations