2018
DOI: 10.2991/ijcis.11.1.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gene expression programming algorithm for discovering classification rules in the multi-objective space

Abstract: Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been criticized when they are applied to classification rule mining, and, more specifically, in the optimization of more than two objectives due to their computational complexity. It is known that a multi-objective space is much richer to be explored than a single-objective space. In consequence, there are only few multi-objective algorithms for classification and their empirical assessed is quite limited. On the other hand, gene expression programming has emerged a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies, genetic algorithm and gene expression programming (GEP) methods were used for the classification task, which offered the opportunity to evaluate our method from different perspectives. For instance, on the ionosphere dataset, SVMC (94.60%) demonstrated a stronger classification ability over the adaptive reference-point-based non-dominated sorting with GEP (AR-NSGEP) method (87.35%) [30], generational genetic algorithm (GGA) (90.85%), steady state genetic algorithm (SSGA) (91.04%), and crossgenerational elitist selection (CHC) method (90.63%) [31]. According to Table 4, the overall average accuracy reported in the state-of-the-art studies on the seven datasets was 85.68%, while the proposed method obtained average accuracy of 92.56%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, genetic algorithm and gene expression programming (GEP) methods were used for the classification task, which offered the opportunity to evaluate our method from different perspectives. For instance, on the ionosphere dataset, SVMC (94.60%) demonstrated a stronger classification ability over the adaptive reference-point-based non-dominated sorting with GEP (AR-NSGEP) method (87.35%) [30], generational genetic algorithm (GGA) (90.85%), steady state genetic algorithm (SSGA) (91.04%), and crossgenerational elitist selection (CHC) method (90.63%) [31]. According to Table 4, the overall average accuracy reported in the state-of-the-art studies on the seven datasets was 85.68%, while the proposed method obtained average accuracy of 92.56%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because many practical decision-making problems can be formulated as a multi-objective programming, the wide application spectrum and ever-increasing strong interests have encouraged the substantial development of reliable models and efficient algorithms during the recent decades [14][15][16][17]. Numerous researches have been devoted to multi-objective programming combining with different theories and methods, and many significant theoretical and applied findings have been also achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researches have been devoted to multi-objective programming combining with different theories and methods, and many significant theoretical and applied findings have been also achieved. Han et al [16,17] discussed the solution to multi-objective programming with hierarchical structure (bi/tri-level decision-making). Kao et al [18] established a multi-objective programming method to solve the network data envelopment analysis model; Dujardin et al [19] established a multi-objective interactive system for adaptive traffic control; Zhou et al [20] proposed a selection hyper-heuristic based algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems; for the solving algorithm for Multi-objective binary programs, Boland et al [11] discussed the theory foundation of preprocessing and cut generation techniques guaranteeing the existence of a feasible solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, multiple-induced rule-based systems are precisely subject of the multi-view approach, where the joint learning may produce better single systems even from the same dataset. A widely applied search paradigm to induce rule-based classifiers is genetic programming [22][23][24]. It applies the biological evolutionary metaphor on individuals that represent classification rules to generate robust classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%